Terms like "G-spot" & "vaginal orgasm" are apparently misnomers or a identification of what are actually other structures, such as the internal bulbs of the clitoris itself and so on.
Journal article:
Summary: http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/PressRelease/pressReleaseId-112610.html
Full version:
http://media.wiley.com/PressRelease/112610/CA_Anatomy_of_Sex.pdf
news citations:
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/health-fitness/health/Vaginal-orgasm-doesnt-exist-at-all-Study/articleshow/44701884.cms
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/10/08/the-truth-about-female-orgasms-look-to-the-clitoris-not-the-vagina.html
My response: Maybe the terms are inaccurate (eg: g-spot vs urethral sponge). And I bet one still can get some additional response from finding what some call the g-spot. Saying "it doesn't exist" is just plain wrong. Maybe the anatomical labeling is incorrect, or the embryological roots have been misidentified - but that doesn't mean the structure doesn't exist.
No comments:
Post a Comment