Ultra-leftists force women to use the men's restroom at UMOCA

Utah first? Opposites attract? In the shadow of the Temple the Utah Museum of Contemporary Art forces women to use the men's - since both restrooms are now man-welcome.

Not just femmy men. Not just Bruce Jenner deranged gender dysphoric  messed up men. All men - can use both restrooms at UMOCA, and so women have no choice but to watch men use the restroom and to allow easy access to their restroom activities.

Ultra-right wing Mormons spawn and attract ultra-left wing abusively permissive moronic dogmatic Stonewall-agenda leftist fascists.

Strange but true. Welcome to Salt Lake City. The shadow of Stonewall is higher than the shadow of the Mormon Temple. Is that a good thing?

Ask a socially conservative atheist woman from rural China with zero connection to the Bible and Book of Mormon: It's a genuinely dangerous and stupid and abusive idea to have mandatorily all-gender and all-outlier crazy dysphoric fool welcoming restrooms.

I love rebellious cutting edge art. I love pissing off Puritans and ultra-leftists alike.

But look: outliers exist. Dangerous predatory men exist. Women and girls need protection from such men, period.

-----

August 2017 addendum, video commentary:

link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0OSXtiO6eU

The Moral Blindness of Sam Harris: Horrors of Male Circumcision | Problems with Harrisian Veganism

Recently Sam Harris gave some shallow, grudging, tepid, and also highly reprehensible statements regarding male circumcision.

My response:

link to my video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3QKVUCQOfzA

The podcast video to which I'm responding to:
Waking Up with Sam Harris - Ask Me Anything #4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yr1rM37iN4&t=53m33s
...time index 53 minutes 33 seconds.

Further links, regarding circumcision:

Child Circumcision: an Elephant in the Hospital



link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oCEl4HphL9Y
Confronting the FGM and Male Circumcision Double Standard
http://goodmenproject.com/ethics-values/confronting-fgm-male-circumcision-double-standard-hesaid/

"...It is time to stop the compartmentalization exhibited by Shermer and others and recognize that there is '1 cause' here: respecting children’s rights and protecting them from harm..."

Damn right. And to stop double standards and compartmentalization by people like Sam Harris also. There is one cause here, I agree.

As from http://goodmenproject.com/ethics-values/confronting-fgm-male-circumcision-double-standard-hesaid/

---

Quote from Circumcision: The double standard of genital mutilation
http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/circumcision-the-double-standard-of-genital-mutilation-i2-menshealth/

"...we already know the outcry a single case of female genital mutilation would bring … nothing less than a candlelight vigil and 24/7 coverage on CNN. But because men and boys are disposable, their genital mutilation comes with benefits to society … the reduction of fine lines and wrinkles. Isn’t it time that we revisit why it is that we continue to do this … and perhaps even more importantly why we continue to pretend nothing is wrong? Circumcision should not only be less prevalent, but I would suggest it should be outlawed the way female genital mutilation is."

As from from: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/circumcision-the-double-standard-of-genital-mutilation-i2-menshealth/

---
Quote from Worldwide Day of Genital Autonomy:

Alexander Bachl, Speaker of the working group of men affected by circumcision within MOGiS e.V.:

"We, the negatively affected by circumcision, celebrate the anniversary of the ground-breaking judgement by the cologne regional court as an appeal for inalienable rights of all children worldwide to bodily and sexual self-determination. This naturally includes the right to unharmed, intact genitalia. Children's right are to be protected - instead, they are degraded to serve as political negotiation items. No adult is to utilize children's genitalia as means to fulfill their own needs - none, never and for no reason at all."

As from https://genital-autonomy.de/statements-from-may-7th-2014/

---
Good video talking about all types of mutilation:



link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y9QVIJJPCcs
---
Comparisons of male & female mutilations:
http://www.intactwiki.org/wiki/Male_and_Female_Circumcision
and
http://www.circumstitions.com/FGMvsMGM.html

A Rose by Any Other Name?
Rethinking the Similarities and Differences between Male and Female
Genital Cutting
http://historyofcircumcision.net/images/stories/resources/rd-rose07.pdf

Cultural Blindness and Circumcision
https://intactamerica.wordpress.com/2013/08/15/cultural-blindness-and-circumcision/

Foreskin and its 16 Functions: Not 'Just Skin'
http://www.savingsons.org/2015/09/foreskin-and-its-16-functions-not-just.html

Commonly asked questions about circumcision:
http://notjustskin.org/node/7

Horror Stories - Living with the Effects of Circumcision
Circumcision Surgery Accidents, Complications, and Atrocities
http://www.fathermag.com/health/circ/horror/horror.shtml

How Male Circumcision Harms Women
http://www.circumcision.org/harmswomen.htm

Horrific child abuse video - shows actual procedures on young boys:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjUCR44qZLE

Horrors of Circumcision playlist found on youtube:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaqc6ZGf4VBsgFueJW_zHZ7bmJhk6_mvu

A Barbaric Practice, A Human Rights Violation
http://www.menweb.org/svocirc.htm

Efforts to end male genital mutilation in America:
http://www.mgmbill.org/

How the circumcision solution in Africa will increase HIV infections
https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2012/04/20/how-the-circumcision-solution-in-africa-will-increase-hiv-infections/
and
https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2011/07/08/some-common-sense-on-circumcision/

Male genital manipulation: Beyond the tolerable?
https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/12982500/johnsonmalegenitalmutilation2010

============

On Harrisian Veganism:

My video also talks about the risks involved with veganism. Harris is a new vegan. Parkinson's awaits this fledgling neuroscientist.
Veganism represents a f-ing holocaust for insects (!). Think of all the insects much must die to support a vegan diet. All those slave worker bees. All those other insects who're killed, just so that all those f-ing selfish vegans can chomp on a carrot! It's inhumane, or it's ininsectane, or some such thing.

Bottom line is that insects are animals too. Insects are slaves and they die so that vegans can eat their lunches.

Leftist denial of evolution and human nature. It's not a new thing, not at all. Harris is generally speaking in the traditional leftist camp - the mostly non-regressive camp I suppose. A classic liberal / somewhat leftist libertarian. But leftists can and do fall prey pitfalls of denialism.

Veganism is a fundamental dangerous denial of human evolutionary history. Small stomachs. Big brains. Cooked Meat is required. If our ancestors had been vegan, they never would have developed large brains. But the children of Harrisian Veganism are headed for a separate evolutionary track: Parkinson's & small hobbled brains. Rest In Peace (RIP) Robin Williams, a victim of Parkinson's and probably of veganism (same diff' apparently).

Further links, regarding veganism:

Leaders of the Vegan Movement Develop Parkinson's: Case Studies
https://www.drfuhrman.com/library/lack_of_DHA_linked_to_Parkinsons.aspx

10 Reasons Why I’ll Never Be Vegan
http://empoweredsustenance.com/is-vegan-healthy/

5 Reasons Why Vegan Diets May be a Bad Idea
https://authoritynutrition.com/top-5-reasons-why-vegan-diets-are-a-terrible-idea/

I’m not vegan anymore
http://alexandrajamieson.com/im-not-vegan-anymore/

10 vegan diet dangers
http://butternutrition.com/10-vegan-diet-dangers/

Angelina Jolie - The Vegan Diet that Almost Killed Her
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2010/09/17/angelina-jolie-says-vegan-diet-nearly-killed-her.aspx

Veganism Is Bad | Top 5 Reasons Why Vegan Diets Are A Terrible Idea
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=juObXMcjZRk

How the Ethical Argument for Veganism Fails and One Possible Way to Fix It
http://letthemeatmeat.com/post/1141998663/how-the-ethical-argument-for-veganism-fails-and

Cooking Up Bigger Brains - "Our hominid ancestors could never have eaten enough raw food to support our large, calorie-hungry brains, Richard Wrangham claims. The secret to our evolution, he says, is cooking..."
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/cooking-up-bigger-brains/

Meat, Cooked Foods Needed for Early Human Brain
http://www.livescience.com/24875-meat-human-brain.html

Why Fire Makes Us Human - "Cooking may be more than just a part of your daily routine, it may be what made your brain as powerful as it is..."
http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/why-fire-makes-us-human-72989884/?no-ist

Raw Food Not Enough to Feed Big Brains
http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/10/raw-food-not-enough-feed-big-brains

Food For Thought: Meat-Based Diet Made Us Smarter
http://www.npr.org/2010/08/02/128849908/food-for-thought-meat-based-diet-made-us-smarter

============

Joint Conclusion

By becoming vegan & touting that veganism is one pinnacle of morality on his Moral Landscape, Harris shows just exactly why there's problems with any "scientist" trying to define morality, particularly one with as many moral blind spots as Harris has.

A morality which actively denies human evolutionary history, while ignoring the horrors caused by the genital rape of young boys - that really is telling.

Keep your "morality" to yourself Mr. Harris. Your pinging & beeping MRI machine cannot & will not determine the morality of any human. The "logic" you use in determining exactly where the valleys and peaks are for human morality is fundamentally flawed.

I have been in general a fan of how exactly Mr. Harris takes apart the arguments of his opponents, and how he engages in dialogue with people. But when I find myself on the other side of his apparently sometimes very faulty arguments, I can now see more clearly how Mr. Harris can also be very blind & boring & pedantic & morally flawed & petty himself.

Human morality is largely determined by evolution. As per Steven Pinker there've been improvements over time. But veganism is a de facto cultistic religion which seeks to separate humans too far from our evolutionary roots. Religions which seek to mutilate the genitals of children also do this! A forced separation from our evolutionary roots. Abuse is abuse. And when we are forced to become separated too far from or evolutionary roots we as evolved human animals are hurt by such acts.

Margaret Sanger - as amoral as Peter Singer sadly

Ayaan Hirsi Ali has stated that everyone is a little bit racist & I agree. Maybe everyone is a little bit of a eugenicist also. Margaret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, apparently wrote a rather distasteful article on the issue. Check out page 107 of the following document:

http://www.toomanyaborted.com/1932-04%20April-PLAN%20FOR%20PEACE.pdf

And a more readable version:
http://hawaii.edu/religion/courses/sanger.htm

"The main objects of the Population Congress would be:
    a. to raise the level and increase the general intelligence of population.

    b. to increase the population slowly by keeping the birth rate at its present level of fifteen per thousand, decreasing the death rate below its present mark of 11 per thousand.

    c. to keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.

    d. to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

    e. to insure the country against future burdens of maintenance for numerous offspring as may be born of feebleminded parents, by pensioning all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization.

    f. to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.

    g. to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives..."

---end of quote

Well, isn't that nice. All the good old fashioned family values we've come to expect from rather famous eugenicists. I guess what pops into the brain of one totalitarian zealot who had only one testicle can easily somehow pop into the pretty brain & eyes of another - the second person having no testicles at all. What's up with that? Was advocacy for eugenics just a 1932 "thing," or was this all just a coincidence?

Further thoughts:

Hitchens on abortion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcYv9hAkenI
and
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B8HhTKzmvas

I am reminded of the crazed hysteria on the left revolving around overpopulation, a hysteria which has caused some people, sadly, to not have children of their own. "Those people in the third world have a lot of babies & so therefore I should have none." Crazy & stupid in my view.

More smart people and more atheists should have children. Yes, Planned Parenthood may do some good. But, Margaret Sanger was a eugenic authoritarian nutbag also - no better than parents who consider after-birth abortion today. Oh, who else thinks such a thing is ok? Peter Singer:
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2013/01/atheist-morality-response-to-peter.html
and
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2013/01/peter-singer-is-amoral-fuck-speaking-as.html

In looking at source documents by Margaret Sanger, it appears that she was an amoral fuck also.

Women raped, and all women up until the baby is viable, should be able to get abortions if they want them. But I also agree that the procedure should, in general, be highly discouraged.

Not everything is equal. Sanger & Singer are in rather the same boat - a boat I prefer not to be in.