Sexual inversion (homosexualisty AKA faggyfagism) results from the Spray of evolution. A side effect. Faggyfagism is not selected by evolution. It can't be.
The word sex only means activities with one's sexual organs which are directly inherently reproductive. Other activities, are just wankery. And wankery isn't selected for by evolution.
Postmoderist lies undergird the Stonewall LGBTQPZ project.
The spray of evolution is aiming torward reproduction. Faggyfagism is simply side-spray. But a main driver of people into the dead end death cult of Stonewall, are postmodernist lies. Bad memes, instead of bad genes.
Choose live, instead of the death cult lies of the cultural & political left.
Bruce Bagemihl, lgbt, lgbtqpz, evolution, stonewall, sex, faggyfag, postmodernism, tranny, gay, fag, life, choose life, atheists of utah
The vid they banned, now on the venerable site BitChute:
Copy of censorship notification email is below. Their assertions are absurd, libelous, and slanderous. I want to fucking, SAVE LIVES (!!!) by not having people drawn into the bastard religion secular cult which is, All The Letters of Stonewall! L G B T, oh and P and Z. One letter after another, one reason after another, to not have kids, or to fuck up the lives of children you happen to have had before being sucked in.
Additional related screen clips:
=========================================
=========================================
=========================================
Censorship shall result in amplification, duplication, and increased visibility.
Operation Clambake, Fighting SJW Edition is in operation.
Violating our rules against hateful conduct.
You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.
As a result, we’ve temporarily limited some of your account features. While in this state, you can still browse Twitter, but you’re limited to only sending Direct Messages to your followers –– no Tweets, Retweets, follows, or likes. Learn more. Your account will be restored to full functionality in: 12 hours and 0 minutes.
——
I was on there with a pseudonym. There’s more where that came from.
As for FB the fight continues here also. San Fran freakazoids.
And I say this as a guy who’s seen lives destroyed in my own family via the abusive permissiveness of the cultural left. Real lives, real families, destroyed.
I posted an initial response. Other people responded to my post. I responded to them. Then today March 25, 2018 I received a notice from Facebook that I was being blocked from posting for three days.
Fuck Facebook Censorship. Mark Zuckerberg, Go Fuck Yourself! The authoritarian left in Silicon Valley, micromanaging the thoughts of the planet (well, they're trying as hard as they can anyway). And Facebook is a large enabling force promoting forced gender dysphoria acceptance (aka tranny freak acceptance).
Also regarding Faisal, well in my view he's mostly a cookie-cutter leftist. Came from Iraq. Jumped into leftist atheism. Big whoop. His views are predictable and myopic. A leftist socially. An appreciator of moron Sam Harris. I follow him on Facebook because I appreciated some of his stances, but he basically has no clue regarding how gender dysphoria is abusively-enabled by the left.
My original comment in response to Faisal:
The mental illness of gender dysphoria spreads.
SJWism and denialist neomarxist social constructivist postmodernism spreading, is #abusive , #stupid , and #notgreat.
The left places gold stars on the foreheads of whomever is the very best, at not having children.
Having the general denialist life destroying meme set of leftism spread, is sad.
You advocate for the tenants of what is essential a denialist abusive cult.
—————— Additional responses posted in response to other responses received:
Apparently in Faisal’s mind a pinnacle-level achievement has been reached. A gender dysphoric victim of leftist denial of basic human nature and human evolution, becomes a newscaster in Pak.
What an achievement.
Score one for the death of the Enlightenment.
And eugenicist Margaret Sanger’s birth control pill contributes to the abuse also along side neomarxist postmodernism. Today’s flat-earthers.
————-
Gabriel Carter thank eugenicist Sanger.
Female mate preference altered.
Lives robbed of children.
Unnatural lives.
Your average Whole Foods shopper would one would think want to live as naturally as possible. But stereotypically such pop eugenicist Sanger’s pill like candy.
Thus, block 1.2 years of evolutionary history as sexual animals, at our peril.
....another key way the left interferes with people’s bedroom activities more than the right.
When science debunks a cherished leftist view, now that is an inconvenient truth.
——————
Théo Blue wtf. Hardly a cure. Transitioning is a path to rather highly probable suicide. Also one cannot transition.
Humans are a sexually dimorphic species. Two genders, not changeable.
Humans are not born blank slates. Remember that point? And humans can be sucked into destructive dead end cults.
Being trans is to be a member of a destructive dead end cult.
A life robbed of inherent reproduction and natural born children.
And a damn high suicide rate.
—————-
Yazmina Kara gender dysphoria is caused by the moron science denying neomarxist cult of postmodernism.
DNA codes for gender period.
If the “body image” doesn’t match, then that is a mental illness. A problem. And it’s a problem egged on and rewarded by the cultural left.
A hierarchy of group right and group blames. A victimhood hierarchy. This is what the left operates. And “coming out” as a non-reproductive outlier of whatever type is a way to rise up on this hierarchy the left operates.
Abuse. A form of suicide. Lives and families destroyed. Yes the left interferes in people’s bedroom activities, that is reproductive activities far more than the right.
The right live lives which are functionally more true, in good ways, to our evolutionary heritage.
——————
Aishik Adhikary lives are destroyed by bad meme sets. Why care about that? For the same reason we care about members of Jim Jones style cults.
Neomarxist postmodernism is a de facto cult. Marxism too. Leftism in general denies science and evolution far more than the right.
Non-binary gender BS.
The claim one can change genders BS.
Denying the sexually dimorphic nature of humans, BS.
Abusively rewarding people for “coming out” as non-reproductive outliers, BS.
—————
Aishik Adhikary lgbtqaaipzpfwhatever.
We are born with brains which can be hijacked and sucked into destructive dead end cults.
Sexual inversion of whatever type is n-o-t selected for by evolution. Rather such proclivities, where they actually exist, are simply noise resulting from the imprecise way evolution works.
In the case of humans though, because our brains can be and are easily sucked into wrong thinking wrong headed destructive meme sets, I suspect the born-that-way status is far more rare than the abuse victims and their enablers claim.
A gold star on the foreheads of those robbed of inherent reproduction. A high social reward from the left. Oh and females taught to hate males, to hate having children, and to deny their own natures as females, also serves as an enabling force for more males being sucked into abusive dead end sexual inversion.
It’s not my fault the right is right on social issues. The religious right don’t understand why they are right on social issues, even though they are. Why is this the case? Religions couch evolved traits. Couch.
Daniel Dennett’s dangerous idea re religion being a natural phenomenon, a dangerous idea which even he doesn’t understand the full impact of.
Yes there may be femmy men and manly women born, but consider what their life paths would have been 100 or 1000 or 10000 years ago? Inherent reproduction.
We are sexual animals. The cultural left robs people of this key trait and key life part, the most key trait of all.
Lives destroyed by bad memes. LGBTQnon-reproduction whatever. Members of a denialist dead end suicidal cult. Lives robbed of our true heritage as sexual animals.
——————
Aymen Adhami Margaret Sanger was a eugenicist. She wanted to cull the poor and the blacks. Her baby killing abattoir known as Planned Parenthood does this every day.
Black lives don’t matter much to your neighborhood abortion clinic.
Why do blacks jump at the chance to kill their own? Perhaps for the same reason they belong en masse to the political party which enslaved their ancestors, the Democrat party.
The term “sneaky fuckers” was coined by evolutionary biologist John Maynard Smith to describe subordinate males who take advantage of opportunity to mate with females while dominant males are otherwise occupied.
—-end of quote.
—————— end of original comment & replies to others, all censored by Facebook.
The Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UMFA) and Utah Museum of Contemporary Art (UMOCA) are unsafe places for women and girls. The cancer of neomarxist postmodernism has visited both government-owned museums.
If you're a normal human who isn't a forced abused abusive outliter, these government-owned places are actively disenfranchising you and yours. Discrimination, against the normal. Discrimination, against the sane. Risky unsafe environments for women, girls, and families.
Denialist fools and abusive morons, morons who deny 1.2 billion years of evolutionary history and basic evolved human nature.
My response, to the museum - which they later censored on their Facebook page.
The cancer of postmodernism visits UMFA.
Risky, pro-rape culture, allowing men into the women's restrooms.
Human gender is binary.
Your sign is a lie.
Fools and denialist morons 'acknowledge' otherwise.
And having the State of Utah make such claims via the University of Utah is outrageous.
I don't want my tax money going to support neomarxist postmodern lies.
Their response to me:
Jonathan, thanks for coming to the UMFA today. We hope you felt welcome.
It's important to us that all of our visitors feel welcome, no matter
their age, ability, knowledge of art, background, race, sexual
preference, or gender identity. Thanks for sharing this sign—we're proud
of it.
My follow up to them in response:
Being proud of shoving neomarxist postmodern cult ideology down the throats of all visitors, is not a good thing.
Women in the women's restrooms, don't have a choice w/this policy which
is an affront to 1.2 billion years of evolutionary history and basic
human biology.
The University of Utah and therefore the State of
Utah, cannot declare by fiat utter lies about human nature, human
evolution, and basic biological facts.
Humans are a gender binary species, period. And men, any men, do not belong in the women's restrooms.
A risky atmosphere, for women and girls.
Pro true rape culture.
If you must have a room for the gender dysphoric, make it single tenant.
Your post is a middle finger to all sane people within Utah.
No tax money to support the neomarxist postmodernist cult.
Copy of an email I've sent to my elected state representatives:
It's not up to an art museum, an art department, art graduates, the University of Utah, or the State of Utah to unilaterally decide they can alter biological & evolutionary facts, unilaterally change human nature, and reject 1.2 billion years of history. On a main Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UMFA) restroom they have a sign which states the following:
"While building code currently requires gender binary signs on the doors, the UMFA acknowledges that gender is not binary. Please use the restroom that feels most comfortable to you."
The claim that human gender is not binary is an absurd, abusive, and factually incorrect claim.
There is a flavor of neomarxism called social constructivist postmodernism, an ultra leftist ideology which is highly abusive.
I agree with Dr. Jordan B. Peterson and Dr. Gad Saad that postmodernism is a denialist cult of the left with roots in basic neomarxism.
1.2 billion years of evolutionary history, and basic facts of human nature, versus absurd governmental declarations by the State that gender is not binary.
The postmodern ideology of the social justice warrior (SJW), versus facts and reason.
Yes the cultural left does deny science and history and evolution and facts about human nature and human biology.
The cancer of postmodernism visits UMFA, the University of Utah, and the State of Utah.
Risky pro-rape culture: allowing men into the women's restrooms.
Human gender is binary.
Their sign is a lie.
Having the State of Utah make such claims via the University of Utah is outrageous.
I don't want my tax money going to support neomarxist postmodern lies.
Women in the women's restrooms, don't have a choice with this policy which is an affront to the integrity and safety of women and girls, and also to our very key nature as humans.
The University of Utah and therefore the State of Utah, cannot declare by fiat utter lies about human nature, human evolution, and basic biological facts.
Humans are a gender binary species, period. And men, any men, do not belong in the women's restrooms.
A risky atmosphere, for women and girls.
Pro true rape culture.
If they must have a room for the gender dysphoric, make it single tenant.
The UMFA sign in question is a middle finger to all sane people within Utah. And yes this is about a cultural war, in this case a battle between anti-science anti-reason virtue-signaling SJW leftists, and women and girls who deserve better.
What choice are women and girls given to in this case to not have men in their restrooms? None.
Truly-female children and truly-female adults deserve better, from the UMFA, the University of Utah, and the State of Utah.
Again it's not the place of art graduates, an art department, the University of Utah, or the State of Utah, to deny 1.2 billion years of our own evolutionary history and basic human nature.
Big brains can produce the mental illness of gender dysphoria. That doesn't mean we cease being a gender binary species.
Gender is binary in the human animal.
Please have the referenced sign removed at the State of Utah University of Utah museum known as the Utah Museum of Fine Arts.
-----
Description of new Facebook page created about this issue, created primarily because the UMFA has blocked me from posting comments on their facebook page in violation of the First Amendment:
The Utah Museum of Fine Arts is an unsafe environment for women and girls.
If you're a female you have ZERO CHOICE regarding whether men can spy on you while you use the restroom at UMFA. Zero, choice.
Also the UMFA claims that humans are not gender binary, which is historically, evolutionarily, and factually absurd. Humans are a sexually dimorphic species period.
What's really at play here is the cancer of neomarxist postmodernism and social justice warriorism (SJWism) creating an atmosphere where UMFA managers feed they must virtue signal. But their virtue signally is not only absurd it's also abusive.
1.2 billion years of evolutionary history and facts about human nature, versus postmodernist utter lies and abuse.
The UMFA is actively censoring posts about this topic on their own page, in violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution - the Redress of Grievances. UMFA is a public museum and is part of the State of Utah.
I was banned for posting the following comment in response to a post. The original post asked if 'LGBTs' had a place in conservatism. I posted my response and then was banned within about 14 hours. Here's a clip of the post to which I was responding...
Conservatism is conservatism.
----- quote begins of banned post
Space or safe space?
Socially conservative would mean conserving and valuing our 1.2 billon year evolved morality.
Are you inclined to make one of these (see the small human animal pictured) au naturel or not? If not, you are an outlier, either a forced victim of abusive postmodernism, or a much less common DNA type.
T - the gender dysphoric exist for sure. May they find recovery via mental health counseling.
L - please loose weight and try to be more attractive. You're cheating yourself and others.
G - most are abuse victims and forced outliers.
B - abusive denialist cheaters. Choose to be a non-outlier if you can.
---- end of quote
Wolves in the hen house apparently, or at the very least touchy outliers who don't like the truth of long standing biological history and evolution.
Apparently the LGBTPZ fiscal conservatives will not tolerate social conservatives who question their denialist liberal doctrines.
Gays are victims of postmodernism.
When I see people jumping off a cliff, yes that offends my sensibilities
Socially conservative atheists exist. Abusively permissive, denialist, pot smoking libertarians who are not socially conservative can't tolerate their presence though.
1.2 billion years of evolutionary history is so inconvenient.
Our evolved morality is not subjective. Whereas abusive neomarxist postmodernism is.
The censoring non-conservative admins of a 'Conservative Atheists' group on facebook:
There are alternate groups on facebook with similar names.
Thus my own banning has not blocked me completely on there. But it's worth noting that fiscal conservatives who see themselves as 'quintisentially' conservative, really aren't.
A true conservative would be both socially and fiscally conservative.
Conserve, what's good about 1.2 billion years of evolved human history. The valuing of family. The valuing of life. Yes the valuing of inherent reproduction. And yes, devaluing abusive non-reproductive outliers. Working to help people live happy lives, through education and advocacy. Advocacy for the valuing of highly useful and good evolved human values.
Utah first? Opposites attract? In the shadow of the Temple the Utah Museum of Contemporary Art forces women to use the men's - since both restrooms are now man-welcome.
Not just femmy men. Not just Bruce Jenner deranged gender dysphoric messed up men. All men - can use both restrooms at UMOCA, and so women have no choice but to watch men use the restroom and to allow easy access to their restroom activities.
Strange but true. Welcome to Salt Lake City. The shadow of Stonewall is higher than the shadow of the Mormon Temple. Is that a good thing?
Ask a socially conservative atheist woman from rural China with zero connection to the Bible and Book of Mormon: It's a genuinely dangerous and stupid and abusive idea to have mandatorily all-gender and all-outlier crazy dysphoric fool welcoming restrooms.
I love rebellious cutting edge art. I love pissing off Puritans and ultra-leftists alike.
But look: outliers exist. Dangerous predatory men exist. Women and girls need protection from such men, period.
Facebook Censorship: Tranny, Feminazi - these are leftist "bad words" which will get you reported by leftist fascists and auto-banned by FB thought-control bots.
When freakish abusive trannies come to the fore, those of us who value non-outlier human history & human values & family values complain, and we speak our mind. But such actions are too much for leftist fascists.
When Bruce Jenner came out as an outlier freak, we complained. The response? SHUT UP! - from leftists and leftist-fascism enablers who run Facebook.
Later, when supports of gay marriage find there's "people of reason" (AKA atheists) who oppose gay marriage, they can't handle that fact. They report posts they disagree with so as to attempt to shut those people up.
24 hour ban resulting from the following exchange:
Freedom is a leftist swear word, a leftist "hate speech" word.
Freedom of thought.
Freedom of speech.
Freedom to refuse to comply with leftist dogma & doctrines. Sacrilege. The new religion of our day. And Facebook operators play a key part in the fascism of the left.
Ultra-leftist type, and Darrel Ray's own, "sexuality" are apparently assumed by Ray and his followers as being The
definition of Secular Sexuality: It or they are Not.
You've been very verbose with your efforts to date, so I've opted for a verbose response.
A great crusade has been launched and is ongoing. But here's my take on your whole effort:
I agree that the "addiction" paradigm regarding sexuality is inherently abusive.
A better view would be this: Our brains were set up by evolution via natural selection to be "addicted" to certain activities, and that's a damn good thing, otherwise we probably wouldn't be alive today.
Drugs can hijack that built in system.
People try and make money off of selling sex as a means of hijacking our evolutionary-"designed"-sexual-system.
When people leave conservative religions they can jump to the complete opposite side of things, and can go right off a cliff.
I agree with a fair amount of what you say. But I think you have gone off the deep end yourself, by reportedly being a "polyamory" type person and advocate.
Within the context of the incredibly toxic way rightist religion shames regarding sex, it's very understandable why some people find it necessary to maintain high value with letting it all hang out. But there are some fully natural & reasonable reasons why religions have codes of conduct regarding sex.
A damn hard thing for an ex-religionist to admit.
Yes the ultra-right goes too far (too much shame), but so does the ultra-left in their own way (too little shame, and not recognizing how there's fully natural & reasonable value to ideals like monogamy, fidelity, and working to direct your sexual energy into productive activities eg. dating & inherently reproductive marriage as opposed to not).
People can be and are victims of the ultra-left (which they jump to and glom onto after being ultra-right).
I was raised a Mormon. After leaving Mormonism I became an ultra-leftist. I spent several years wading in the swimming pool of the left. Now I'm married to a socially-moderate-to-conservative atheist from China, a woman with zero connection to the Bible, Quran, or Book of Mormon. Where did her social-conservatism come from? Joseph Smith? Mohamed? The Pope? No. It came from her humanity, and culture is inseparable from biology & evolution.
Daniel Dennett's dangerous idea is that religion is a natural phenomenon. This fact cuts several ways. Yes it shows that religion is not "divine," but it also shows that it's very human.
Fully natural evolved codes of conduct do exist within religion. Dismissing all those codes simply because there's a charismatic charlatan as a leader of a given religion is premature. The codes themselves can have some very good reasons for existing. Yes, some bad, but also some good.
So what to do as a person who's very angry at the abuses of conservative religion regarding sexuality? Completely rebel? Proclaim that full sexual freedom is best? No. You're setting yourself and others up for failure if this is the route you take and/or advocate.
Like it or not shame evolved as a useful tool of protection within the human animal.
Regarding the DSM-IV: Whatever happens to be written inside books of this nature isn't "science." Psychology is not really a true science as such. There's huge leftist cultural confirmation bias going in within groups like the APA. Examples? Google for them yourself, but suffice it to say that the cultural left does not have all the answers.
Yes Mr. Ray I loath and hate Spencer Kimball & Boyd Packer & Joseph Smith & Mohamed. But on the other hand, my own wife is a sort of "control" for what humans do when they're *not* exposed to Abrahamic faith.
Also the left's fear of "patriarchy" is dogmatically misplaced misdirected abusive anger in and of itself.
So I agree with a fair amount of your work, but I strongly disagree with the current lengths to which you take it: an apparent de facto advocacy for a level of human promiscuity which is in and of itself inherently abusive. Not because the Bible tells us so, but because human nature and human sexual history tells us so. Infidelity destroys families, because of how human nature is set up, not because a-hole Spencer Kimball thought it was a good idea.
Thanks be to Thomas Rowlandson, and Mihály Zichy, and films like the Good Old Naughty Days, yes I agree with that. On the other hand there's some damn good reasons to be faithful to one's wife, and to value inherently reproductive marriage & monogamy & families & life, and to be highly skeptical of abusive humans who want to sell sex for money & so on - to yes hijack our evolutionary evolved sexual systems for their own ends. So this is all a balancing act between both sides IMO.
I received a few snotty responses from an operator of the FB in question, and from one other guy. Here's quotes of my responses. The page operator deleted some of my replies & the replies of others. Fortunately I made copies before they could click delete.
============== comment 1:
Additional note sent to the guy;
----
Humans gets to make rules to help quell destructive behaviors.
There's better and more productive activities than porn and harlotry that humans can and do engage in.
You've set yourself up as a sort of prophet, imposing your own brand of overly permissive sexuality as *the* secular sexuality. It ain't.
What you're peddling really is an infantile flavor: the initially and understandably rebellious flavor.
After the 60s comes the 70s hangover. And lives are destroyed via too much permissiveness.
It ain't a religion thing. It's a human nature thing.
Science and skepticism are not present in your endeavors.============== comment 2:
How about a podcast that's more along the lines of honest science and true honest skepticism?
Can we be skeptical about the value of the porn industry, and about all things "sex positive?"
Here's my question:
"Do you think selling sexuality and selling your body as a deceptive lie is helpful to society, or an inherent abuse?"
The assumption that being a secular who's sexual must mean all porn is good, and that monogamy is inherently bad, is a very misguided and very-unscientific non-skeptical assumption.
Science requires a crucible. Your requirement of having questions which "...must be sex positive..." disallows honest scientific & skeptical inquiry into the subject.============== comment 3:
Ad hominem fallacy and completely false claims.
I don't need your luck and neither do regular faithful monogamous humans trying to get on with their lives raising productive happy families.
The key touchstones for the rebellious here are harlots of one type or another.
Yes the machinery of evolution produces non-productive outlier activity, but humans are not bonobos.
Lives and families are destroyed via too much permissiveness.
Poly people are being abusive to themselves and others.
The ultra left is no answer to the ultra right.
We, recoverers from religion don't need the abusive non- solutions offered within the chambers of harlots, pornographers, and poly people who're in denial about human nature and the *value* of avoiding destructive outlier type behaviors.
If you or anyone here were interested in science and skepticism you wouldn't be putting all your eggs in the baskets of greedy abusers who're working to hijack our sexual systems to their own ends.
============== end of comments posted on the FB page in question.
Follow up thoughts:
Ray has reportedly come out as "polyamorous." Here is a graphical symbol he frequently uses in his conference presentation:
The above symbol is a slightly modified version of the symbol for transgenderism.
Also a brief view of the recent podcasts put on by Ray has swingers, porn stars, and various flavors of other "outlier" groups.
SweetWomanDirtyMind blogger – Lisa – talks about transitioning from religious to atheist, from monogamous to kinkster, swinger and sex positive blogger.
Sandra Meade is the host on one of the longest running LGBT shows in the
US. She is also an activist for Transgender issues and rights. We
discuss a broad range of topics.
Dr. Ray talks with 3 polyamorous people about relationships and jealousy.
And from their FB page:
Secular Sexuality Podcast
October 2 at 8:22am ·
Dear friends of the Secular Sexuality Podcast, on Monday I will be taping an interview with the Internationally known porn star Angela White from Australia. She actually ran for Parliament a few years ago as a member of the Sex Party, a fully recognized political party in Australia, I met the president Fiona Patten, when I was in Australia a few years ago. I want to give my listeners an opportunity to ask a question so here is my offer, if you would like to ask her a question put it in the comments below. I will select one or two questions to ask her, from those submitted. Questions need to be related to the theme of the podcast and must be sex positive. http://angelawhite.com/
---------end of quote
Porn stars, swingers, poly people, so-called transgender people, militant homosexual advocates: The quintessence of ultra-leftist sexuality today.
To Ray and his groupies the absolute quintessence and near utopian stance of human sexuality is represented by what inherently non-reproductive outliers do, and what non-monogamous people do.
They conflate the fact that humans share a common ancestor with Bonobos with what human nature is.
They conflate what humans do (cheat), with what humans need to do to have happy families (not cheat)!
They conflate and mix up their own desires to rebel against ultra-right religion, their chosen-ultra-rebellious flavor of sexuality, with what normal healthy thriving happy human sexuality is.
Permissive relativist liberalism destroys families and lives.
Jumping from the ultra-right to the ultra-left can result in the destruction of your family (via cheating, betrayal, and via deadly STDs).
Polyamory advocates are in denial about human nature. The answer to the ultra-right is not dismissing all sexual shame, rather it's putting that shame within context: the biological and evolutionary context.
There are damn good reasons for sexual shame: family stability, child support, happiness, progress, growth. Shaming for destructive abusive dead end outlier behaviors, all that shame has some very reasonable evolutionary roots.
All this is completely lost on Ray in my view.
Polyamory (eg: swinging - sex with multiple partners openly simultaneously) is an inherent abusive, upon those who practice it and the people who're connected to the people who practice it. Children raised in such groupings will end up being abused, by default.
Homosexuality (and gender confusion AKA transgenderism) happen naturally because of how the machinery of evolution by natural sexual selection works, and how sex gets set up in us. Doesn't mean being gay is "preferred" or selected for in any way! It just means that outliers "happen" within the context of the currently-operating machinery of evolution.
Homosexuals and transgender (gender confused /deluded) people have no more right to access to raising children than do animals of a completely different species. Outliers are outliers. But most children are not outliers, and so most children need a mommy and a daddy.
Daniel Dennett's dangerous idea, that religion is a natural phenomenon, cuts several ways as I've noted. Fully natural and highly useful human moral codes exist and are couched within religion. Simply because there are no mystical gods as such doesn't mean natural human moral codes are bogus! This is another key point completely lost on people like Ray and his ultra-leftist followers.
People exposed to the abuses of Mormonism and other conservite religions do have an axe to grind, and for good reason. Yes hard-line rebellion is understandable, but it's not an answer in the end.
Why do humans do what they do? That's a key question. And Darrel Ray does not appear to know any of the proper answers.
On his podcast he states that questions must be "sex positive." That phrase is code for open and ready acceptance of the abusively-permissive flavor of leftist relativist abnormal outlier-embracing sexuality, in other words sexuality which destroys families and lives, and which also is a de facto death cult.
All these people, the poly people, the tranny people, the gay people, the "childfree" people, oh and the pedophile people, the confessed sexual proclivities of all these groups exists because of how evolution by natural selection works. Doesn't mean we shouldn't lock up for life and execute all pedophiles, rather the same way we put down mad dogs. Doesn't mean the "sexuality' of the other groups mentioned must be declared as being equal to normal inherently-reproductive human sexuality.
Sex exists for one reason only: Reproduction. That's it. There is some "spill over" which results, but the spill over effects are N-O-T being selected for by the process of evolution. How can they be? Non-reproductive spill over effects most likely cannot be selected for!
So play while you can. Embrace your inner "you" by doing all the selfish dangerous abusive permissive destructive stuff you can with your sexual organs, but in the end there's really only one useful thing you can ever do with them: make babies. That's it. Don't like that fact? Tough.
Having my cake and eating it too.
How can a ex-Mormon be in favor of more conservative (family focused) forms of sexuality, and still also be an advocate for having adult humans being exposed to more honest expressions of what some would call "porn?"
There is joy in sex and we should realize why that joy is there, and where that joy comes from: from evolution and solely because of reproduction and sexual selection.
Porn 1.0 is based mostly on lies and harlotry.
Porn 2.0 allows for organic expressions via couples and individuals showing their sexuality to other adults. But Porn 2.0 is surrounded by and supported by porn 1.0 abusiveness.
Porn 3.0 could perhaps be a porn 2.0 which is not supported by or surrounded by the abusive money grubbing whorishness and lies of porn 1.0.
What would be some examples of Porn 3.0? Perhaps fine art which accurately depicts sexuality. Perhaps films which depict it, where such films are not being sold within the crass lying money grubbing hijacking porn 1.0 context.
I do think it's important that humans be able to learn about sex, and even be able to revel in it's joys and intricacies and power - but they should and must never forget why sex exists in the first place.
Just because humans shared a common ancestor with Bonobos doesn't mean we can be Bonobos ourselves, not without destroying the lives of our fellow humans and not without destroying our own lives.
Ultra-right religion helps push people to the ultra-left, and by so doing it's acting to abuse people further: because within the ultra-left people learn even more lies about human sexuality and they are foolishly taught on the left that "anything goes," when it does not.
