Ex-Muslims & Trump: Who Makes The Babies, Matters

It’s par for the course of leftists and some socially-liberal business-Republicans, to give Islam a pass.

By some estimates Trump is a RINO, Republican in name only. Trump is the head of the Republican Party now though, and thus his Republicanism is what that party is, for now.

Why was ex-Muslim cartoonist Bosch Fawstin banned on twitter? Because the cultural left gloms onto Islam. Why did Google delete 14 years of Bosch’s blog posts? Same answer. Bosch was very critical of Trump before his election:

Look for
Sunday, August 14, 2016 at:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190322221144/http://fawstin.blogspot.com/2016/08/

...we can only read this now because archive.org auto-archives web pages.

More on Bosch:

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2020/04/google-blogger-deletes-bosch-fawstins.html

After Trump was elected Bosch sometimes approved of Trump and sometimes didn’t. The main thing that sticks in Bosch’s craw is when any politician throws the life experiences of ex-Muslims under the bus.

Obama did this in spades with his evil anti freedom UN speech:

https://reason.com/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho/

Trump did it to a lesser extent as per Bosch’s criticisms.

All things considered I’m still very grateful Trump ran and I think it’s essential he win again.

The current Democrats are not the party of my father or of his father.

Gov job pay to play whoring.

Worse than Watergate spying on political opponents.

It’s all a Democrat thing.

To me Trump embodies the working class values of my old style Democrat father.

Pro native-born working class Americans of all colors, including pro gay marriage (which I am not), and pro Bruce Jenner style denialist tranny (which I am not).  Pro vocational education (which I am). Anti to worthless general-ed higher ed. < -Trump is all this.

The main idiocy of Trump is that he had and has Obama admin holdovers who undermined his admin.

The Pee Dossier. The Flynn case. Abuse of the FISA Court by Obama admin holdovers. A modern coup. Trump should have booted many more Obama-admin traitors.

Anyway so love the bull in the china shop Trump or hate him, or both.

Fawstin is fiercely pro free speech, and for him Trump should appreciate the plight of ex-Muslims like him more.

Pat Condell is a British comedian who appreciates Trump. Condell is Very critical of Islam.

Raheem Kassam is a pro Trump de facto Ex-Muslim.

Another cartoonist: The creator of Batman Chuck Dixon, appreciates Trump.

Gay “married” YouTube commentator Dave Rubin appreciates Trump’s pro gay marriage stances and Trump’s boat rocking approach which blocked far worse Democrat alternatives.

More small L libertarians who supported Trump:

1. https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/11/trump-versus-hillary-trump-had-better.html

2. https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-problems-with-hillary-clinton.html

Thus as I listen to the media especially the legacy flavor, I hear how the wanted so badly gov job pay to play whore and rape enabler Hillary.

NPR. BBC. NYTimes. The Guardian. GQ. Vogue. CNN. MSNBC. NBC. CBS. ABC. PBS Newshour regulars. All wanted Hillary. All hated Trump very tribalistically.

Why? Why Tribalism in favor of a Democrat-Crony-Sociopath status quo?

Religion shows how human tribalism can sometimes go off the rails. Political tribalism can too.

But as for Trump, I appreciate the words of Stephen Bannon: https://youtu.be/8AtOw-xyMo8 ...at Oxford.

Pat Condell
Chuck Dixon
Dave Rubin
Milo Yiannopoulis
Raheem Kassam
Sebastian Gorka
Stephen Bannon
Carl Benjamin - online alias Sargon of Akkas
Tarl Warwick - online alias Styxhexenhammer666
Gad Saad
Camille Paglia
Peter Thiel

All these either actively or pragmatically support the Orange Haired Clown. All these are largely anti-neocon also, as is Trump.

===========

Bosch Fawstin’s store which is still up:

http://theboschfawstinstore.blogspot.com/

========

Naked women protesting, an excellent response to the regressive nature of Islam:
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2015/02/naked-women-protesting-exact-response.html

=====

My journey to conservatism:

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/09/my-journey-to-conservatism.html

My letters to the old fart hippie who introduced me to my wife:

1. https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2020/02/harald-illig-retrograde-anti-life-drunk.html

2. https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/09/an-open-letter-to-harald.html

Why does the cultural left love Islam? In my view because the left tossed the evolved morality couched within Christianity.

Nature abhors a vacuum.

Who makes babies? It matters. And evolution with selection doesn’t care about the feelings of secularists either.

When a culture stops having babies, it becomes broken. The folly of the secular left is not realizing that religion is an evolutionary process itself, one which couches darn useful (and sometimes less useful, out-group) evolved morality.

Leftist political leaders seek to import mass numbers of third world regressives to make babies on their behalf.

Thus in my view we should seek to understand the natural evolutionary underpinnings of all actions.

Reza Aslan's Leftist Violent Nihilism vs Life, Happiness, and Freedom

Reasonably responding to Reza Aslan & the Anti-Life Nihilistic Left, versus Trump & his supporters.

Regarding the constant drip, drip, drip of nihilistic psychopaths:

The charlatan virtue signalers are pointing fingers everywhere except where they should be pointed. Leftist generators of cultural nihilism & lost boys:

1. A key generator of nihilism in the West is culturally Marxist postmodernism.

2. Third Wave Feminism.

3. The LGBTQPZ Stonewall project.

4. The leftist competition to see who's the very best at not having children.

5. Redefining marriage.

6. Denial regarding the sexually dimorphic nature of humans.

7. Devaluing motherhood & fatherhood.

8. Shaming pinks skins AKA whites for having pink skins.

9. Shaming boys for being boys.

Pink-Skin-Carried British & American Western Enlightenment Values ended universal slavery.

Where's my reparations for that (not that I'm asking for any)?

Children are born innocent. Meme sets however can be blamed. When you have a culture which generates nihilists that culture has a problem.

Democrats seek to import voters. The nihilistic violent youth who're members of #Antifa support the corporatist elitist gated community leftists with these goals: open the floodgates.

The native born of all colors are pitted by the Democrats against the people whom the Democrats wish to import as a means of maintaining & gaining power. So that's an abusive situation.

Another meme set that the cultural left loves, Islam, also generates lost boy nihilists so they can have virgins in an afterlife. This is a real thing. Listen to Tawfik Hamid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxfo11A7XuA

Thus nihilism can come from various places.

In today's world we need to be be prepared. Take a multi-faceted approach. The Democrats lie about the motives of Trump and of Trump supporters. 99.9% of Trump supporters would like all potential mass shooters erased.

The Democrats have their violent arm, the death cult army of #Antifa.

Promote life. Find a way to make life - the most important thing we can do during our speck of time here. Christopher Hitchens said this.

Question the dominant paradigm. Question your own beliefs. This is the key spirit of what Christopher Hitchens advocated for.

The people putting out the most racist & pro-violence dog whistles these days are the Democrats.

Reza Aslan is such a one, a man who's apparently pro-violence-against-Republicans type of guy.

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/08/05/nolte-reza-aslan-calls-kellyanne-conway-the-evil-we-need-to-eradicate/

Reza Aslan is a slick tongue opportunistic charlatan who promotes a rose colored view of Islam. His longer term game has been to go on legacy media news outlets and basically lie about Islam.

POS violence promoting Aslan claimed that Ayaan Hirsi Ali is "dangerous."

https://twitter.com/rezaaslan/status/595264092450918400

Hirsi Ali and Theo Van Gogh created the film "Submission Part 1," a film critical of how Islam treats women. Van Gogh was killed as a result. And Hirsi Ali must have round the clock security & moved to the USA a result of threats against her. And yet asshat Aslan thinks Hirsi Ali is dangerous.

The film Submission Part 1:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6rS8FJyX3gs

Yes and while Aslan should be rightly seen as a lying opportunistic charlatan, the same can also be said of prominent Democrats especially Democrat blacks, who belong to a party which enslaved their ancestors, a party which booted the Amerindians off their lands, a party which interned the Japanese Americans during World War II, and a party which has imported anti-American anti-Enlightenment culturally-Marxist postmodernism into America.

The Republican Party was against all these things.

If you're going to ascribe blame to meme sets, let's blame the Democrat Party for what they should be blamed for. This is why I renounce my prior association with the Democrat Party.

I voted for Obama twice, but now I regret those votes primarily because of:

1. Obama utterly betrayed the Western Enlightenment & American projects by stating that his preferred future must belong to those who don't slander the prophet of Islam. Does Obama consider himself to be the America's Islamic Imam? Blasphemy laws are antithetical to the American & Enlightenment projects.

https://reason.com/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho

2. Obama associated with leftist terrorist Bill Ayers.

3. Obama greatly appreciated the work of anti-American anti-Enlightenment leftist traitor Saul Alinsky.

Democrats de facto and in fact support the violent terrorist organization Antifa - the angry nihilistic youth who misdirect their anger toward people who can help them be less nihilistic, toward the cultural right in other words.

Trump has denounced white supremacy. If you're a virtue signaling lying Democrat, you'll seek to deceive the chump left regarding what Trump has actually said & what Trump's supporters actually believe.

Lost Boys via Leftism & Islam

https://youtu.be/k2zZ-omAImI 

Lost Boys: Leftist postmodernist ideology & Islam both are generators.

Fascism is an offshoot of Marxism

Some meme sets can create lost boys and which promote nihilism.

Teach that pink skins should hate their skin color.

Teach that boys should have their evolved male human nature.

Systematic hatred of being male and hatred of having pink skin.

That's going to have some downstream effects and create disconnected boys.

Islam teaches young men that one way they can have a sexual relationship is via a suicide bombing. This is a real thing. Listen closely to Tawfik Hamid:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxfo11A7XuA

Good guys with guns kill bad guys with them. More good guys with guns is a good thing.

Less shaming for being male & having pink skin would help.

Democrats want to import voters from south of the border, at the expense of the native born Americans of all skin colors.

Postmodernism promotes nihilism.

Having an abusively open southern border pushes wages down for the native born, and pushes up the houses prices also.

Examine how Islam creates nihilistic psychopaths.

The cultural left creates nihilistic psychopaths.

Disconnected boys & men.

Be prepared. All "fish in the barrel" type shops should have at least two armed guards in each one, and all schools too.

More people with a concealed weapons permit.

Will the Democrats be denouncing #Antifa? No. Antifa is the violent arm of the Democrat party. And again fascism is an offshoot of Marxism.

Multifaceted approach: Protection, plus realizing what meme sets create disconnected boys & psychopaths.

Review of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the National Museum of the American Indian

Review of the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the National Museum of the American Indian.

History as portrayed by these "national museums" isn't true history. Both omit the following key facts & points:

1. The American project AKA the Western Enlightenment project, ended universal slavery.

2. The role of Islam w/slavery.
https://atlantablackstar.com/2014/06/02/10-facts-about-the-arab-enslavement-of-black-people-not-taught-in-schools/
and http://originalpeople.org/the-arab-muslim-slave-trade-of-africans-the-untold-story/

3. The fact that Amerindian tribes had slaves & wars of conquest.

4. The fact that the American Civil War was primarily fought over slavery. Member states of the Confederates States of America had to allow for slavery.
https://wallbuilders.com/confronting-civil-war-revisionism-south-went-war/

David Barton on the issue:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QXzoK77IFJ4

5. The black person museum talks of a paradox. Slavery being present in America at its founding was not a paradox, it was simply an indication of a transition period from universal slavery to an abolishment thereof. The gears of Western Enlightenment values took a few years to fully engage and to become more fully realized within an incorporated America.

6. 365,000 Northern Army pink skins AKA whites died so that universal slavery could be ended. The British Royal Navy also helped - more whitey blood spilt to end slavery.

If we're going to have group rights & blames & tribal rights & blames, where's my skin-color and lineage-based "reparations" for the fact that whitey blood was spilled to end universal slavery?

7. Yes some bad things happened when Europeans came to the American continent. But what good things happened as a result of European migration & settlement of America? What, good? The museums don't say. They omit the big oppressive problems with Amerindian culture pre-European influence. They omit the Islamic slave trade. They omit how Western Enlightenment values, as held in the hearts of people like George Washington & Thomas Jefferson helped to eventually and not that far off from America's founding, to end universal slavery. 

8. The Democrat party is the party of slavery, Jim Crow, the KKK, booting Amerindians off their lands, interning Japanese ancestry Americans during WWII, and importing anti Enlightenment anti American Marxism into America. Children are born innocent and are not to blame for past sins, but meme sets can be blamed. This is why I renounce my prior association with the Democrat party.

9. The African museum starts at 1400 and ends with the pinnacle of black American culture: The election of President Obama, a half black half pink-skin Marxist. When Obama was elected I banged on pots & pans also I recall, in celebration. But Obama's subsequent actions turned my good will to ashes, particularly how he trashed those who voted for Trump. Obama voters who decided to vote for Trump were trashed by Obama. Plus there's this issue: https://reason.com/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho <-traitorous to the Western Enlightenment & American projects.

10. Obama loved leftist terrorist Bill Ayers & anti-American anti-Enlightenment traitor Saul Alinsky. He also enjoyed anti-American racist race baiter Jeremiah Wright. Obama's father was basically an anti-Western-Civilization type guy whom Obama followed in the footsteps of.

Check Obama related books:
https://www.dineshdsouza.com/books/

11. Nothing of what D'Souza has reported on is mentioned at either museum. Actual historic facts don't fit into the preferred historical narrative of leftist elitist whites, academics, & race-baiting Ponzi scheme operating blacks & Amerindians.

12. I want all human groups to be successful, but not via cheating, Ponzi schemes, lying including lies of omission, and so on. The black & Amerindian communities are both hobbled by government dependence. Democrats helped replace the FATHER with the STATE in both communities. Democrat LBJ's Great Society destroyed the black family in America.

https://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/lbj-vs-the-nuclear-family/

By the way a "native American" is anyone born in America. Amerindians are Amerindians. Using the term "native American" to only refer to Amerindians is a slap in the face & an insult to all born-innocent children natively born to America.

Children are born innocent & are not to blame for the sins of their ancestors nor for people who happen to have the same skin color. However we should take pride in the successes of our ancestors & all human groups.

The self hatred of the left is more toxic than self hatred on the right. At least the right values life & children & the traditional 1.2 billion year evolved family unit. Whereas the cultural left has a competition going to see who's the very best at not having children. Many black babies have been killed via leftist-whitey-promoted abortion.

Additional related links:

What did Whitey ever do for me?
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2018/08/what-did-whitey-ever-do-for-me-good.html

On Margaret Sanger:
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2013/03/margaret-sanger-also-amoral-fuck.html

PZ Myers is not a biologist. The Racist Squad. Choose Life.

Link to my video: https://youtu.be/mFKXw-LiYyE

The above video and this post are a response to #thequad, a bunch of retrograde racists, and to a related vid by Carl Benjamin AKA Sargon of Akkad:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_nhxjJi1cJ0&t=1m3s

Ayanna Pressley is a retrograde racist & horrid Marxist, as are all of #TheSqad .

Also check out this by Scott Adams re the Squad situation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAjhOJ0FgaE

I voted for Obama twice. I regret that vote. Why? Because the future must belong to those who can freely slander the prophet of Islam!

Check out:
https://reason.com/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho

Obama followed in the footsteps of his anti-colonialist anti-Western-Civilization father. Obama associated with leftist terrorist Bill Ayers and loved the works of Saul Alinsky.

Thus Obama is an overall a traitor to the Western Enlightenment / Western Civilization project.

The left has virtue signalling Ponzi schemes going on. The Ponzi scheme of climate hysteria. The Ponzi scheme of overpopulation concerns. The Ponzi scheme of the LGBTQPZ Stonewall SJW project.

Bruce Bagemihl gets all excited when non-human animals hump animals of the same gender. Big whoop. Such actions are an OUTLIER effect, NOT a selected for effect. Side-spray. Evidence of the incredible force of sex within sexual animals. But the "reason for the season" of sex, is the production of babies, period.

What type of animal celebrates a lack of continuance, of life? A broken one.

Related page with more details, leftist charlatan virtue signalers want your money: https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/10/charlatan-virtue-signalers-want-your.html

Jordan Peterson on overpopulation:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnIKH0bbNSs

P.Z. Myers, is absolutely a retrograde piece of S. Not a biologist at all. Rather an anti-life leftist Marxist activist, and nothing more. Check out this vid (fast forward to 19 minute mark if needs be): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ch1XFqmGeM&t=19m10s

On Myer's twitter feed search for the word "Trump" to see how the man has full force Trump Derangement Syndrome: https://twitter.com/pzmyers/with_replies

Myers' utterly myopic & petty, and unscientific assessments of human nature are display, plus on the his blog he's spent years engaging in petty & mean spirited attacks. He's had a career of doing this.

Additional commentary re the retrograde POS Myers: https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/search/label/pz%20myers

Well before Trump ran for president I had apt assessment of Myers, who is not a scientist, not in the least, regarding humans.

In any case:

Donald Trump embodies the working class values of my old-style Democrat father. A huge gift to the anti neocon Cindy Sheehan left, and to the native-born working class in America.

------------
the squad,carl benjamin,sargon of akkad,obama,islam,free speech,blasphemy,blasphemy laws,western civilization,western enlightenment,enlightenment,classic liberal,social conservative,saul alinsky,bill ayers,pz myers,jordan peterson,Bruce Bagemihl,maga,black education,postmodernism,intersectionality,cultural marxism,marxism,redpill,exmormon,atheism,christianity,human nature,evolution,sjw,biology,leftist,conservative,Ayanna Pressley,racist,racism,trump,Muhammad

Tranny Freaks, Stonewall SJW Faggyfags, Feminazis, and bearded Islamic theocrats want you censored on Twitter and Facebook

Tranny Freaks, Stonewall SJW Faggyfags, Feminazis, and bearded Islamic theocrats want you censored on Twitter and Facebook.

https://youtu.be/tqALOIAyO20

A badge of honor. Banned from Twitter for 12 hours in response to posts I made on March 27, 2018.

The regressive left. The totalitarian left. The abuse enabling left.

A gold star onto the forehead of whomever is the very best at not having children.

Enabling and protecting life-destroying choices. Twitter. Facebook.

Thus: Operation Clambake Stonewall-SJW edition, continues. A multiplication and amplification shall take place.

Censored post on Twitter:

@navyhato @MGTOWBliss
@lads_alliance
@holybibletoday @Partisangirl @facebook Facebook protects Stonewall faggyfag SJWs (incl. tranny freaks), feminazis, and bearded Islamic theocrats. https://t.co/jgJ0o3SjMk

—[link above goes to my blog page: Facebook Censorship: Gender Dysphoria and Faisal Saeed Al Mutar. The Authoritarian Left. http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2018/03/facebook-censorship-gender-dysphoria.html ]

Twitter’s messages:

Violating our rules against hateful conduct.
You may not promote violence against, threaten, or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability, or serious disease.

As a result, we’ve temporarily limited some of your account features. While in this state, you can still browse Twitter, but you’re limited to only sending Direct Messages to your followers –– no Tweets, Retweets, follows, or likes. Learn more. Your account will be restored to full functionality in: 12 hours and 0 minutes.

——

I was on there with a pseudonym. There’s more where that came from.

As for FB the fight continues here also. San Fran freakazoids.

And I say this as a guy who’s seen lives destroyed in my own family via the abusive permissiveness of the cultural left. Real lives, real families, destroyed.

Trump & Brexit: The Leftist Armageddon

The left's version of Armageddon: Voting for Brexit or Trump.

Regarding the following article:

https://medium.com/@theonlytoby/history-tells-us-what-will-happen-next-with-brexit-trump-a3fefd154714#.1t4w90uya

The article appears to consider Brexit and Trump to be a sort of leftist Armageddon.

I 100% agree with Pat Condell regarding the value and necessity of a Brexit:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=THWPJE4xaJM

And I 100% agree with Milo Yiannopoulos regarding the high utilitarian value of Trump.

Interview with Rubin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiA0P9iELAA

Interview with Rogan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnH67G7vAu4

The ultra-leftist conspiratorialism present in the article reminds me of the ultra-rightist conspiratorialism I encountered while I was in Alaska. Tin pot hat leftistism.

Here's responses to a few key sections of the article:

"The liberal intellectuals are always in the minority."

Response:

Liberals such as they are control most of the media. NY Times. NPR. MSNBC. BBC. CBC. PRI. CNN. Washington Post. LA Times. USA Today. Cable comedy news programs. Nighttime comedy interview shows. Twitter. Facebook. Google.

Liberals such as they are control most of the Academy. Most college campuses are iron fistedly controlled by leftists, and now most pander to the social justice warrior (SJW) left.

"The people who see that open societies"

Open societies like Europe, where we now have rape gangs & mass rapes, women and children at risk via rape & attack, cartoonists murdered & under threat, Orwellian speech & thought control codes (ie: "hate speech" laws), a Voldemort affect regarding Islam (active denial that Islam is a problem or THE problem, again and again, murder after murder by Islamic people).

"being nice to other people"

It's not nice to let people simmer in their human spirit destroying cults. They get upset when we do. 9/11 is one such example. Misdirected anger. Iraq & Afghanistan were perfectly reasonable responses to 9/11.

Leftists seem to have a high appreciation for the value of brutal & bloody dictators. And come to find out Sadam did have WMDs after all:

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/bombshell-new-york-times-reports-wmds-found-iraq/

https://www.wired.com/2010/10/wikileaks-show-wmd-hunt-continued-in-iraq-with-surprising-results/

And remember what Hitch said about Iraq:

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2007/03/so_mr_hitchens_werent_you_wrong_about_iraq.html

...before the 2010 revelation from wikileaks.

Hitch was right, and he was right even before WMD material was found in Iraq.

"not being racist"

Leftists are the most racist people I know nowadays. Everything is about race, even religion is now a race. Islam is a race according to them. And everything is about fervently and frantically maintaining a hierarchy of social justice 'rights' and shaming.

Islam is at the top.

Amerindians, perhaps next.

Blacks, next - so long as they tow the liberal party line & don't go off the Democrat plantation.

Gays, next - but only leftist gays.

Gender dysphoric people (AKA 'transgender'), next.

Mexicans, next, but only leftist Mexicans who want to erase the borders & come to the U.S. illegally.

Women, next, but only leftist women and preferably women who're 'childfree.' If you're a stay at home 'breeder,' that's bad. (An abusive stance by the way)

Asian men, next - because they're 'too successful.'

Pink skinned men (aka 'whites'), bottom of the pile.

Any cultural values derived from 'whites' are on the bottom of the SJW pile of rights-hierarchy. The right to exist. The right to be promoted. The bottom-pile items have mostly zero rights.

Meme sets aren't races. And race is a racist concept to begin with.

"not fighting wars"

Wars like WWII? Wars like those which took place in Afghanistan & Iraq (Afghanistan especially)? The war which needs to happen with the newest 'Islamic State?' And yes, a culture war between the Western Enlightenment culture and Islam - a war of ideas, and if needs be of force so as to protect the Enlightenment values of freedom of speech & freedom to be a Western-type person in a Western country unthreatened by abusive crazy murderous Islamic Puritans?

Sitting on our hands doesn't work. Doing this allowed Islamic State to be born.

Obama told the UN that his preferred future belongs to those who never talk smack about the prophet of Islam. This was perhaps the biggest betrayal ever of The Enlightenment by a sitting U.S. President. The United States was founded on Enlightenment principles. And to state that a given religion cannot be criticized, that's a betrayal.

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho

Obama & Wife of Bill helped birth Islamic State.

Saying it so doesn't make it so. Saying that Islam is a religion of peace doesn't make it a religion of peace. As per historical Islam and current Islam, the leaders, the documents, everything, Islam is a religion of war. It's a religion of conquest. It's a religion of murder and of rape and of pedophilia. Oh, and it's also a religion of genital rape of both females and males (even in 'moderate' Muslim countries, there's a very high dual-gender genital mutilation rate).

"is a better way to live"

So allowing psychopathic dictators to rule everything is a better way to live?

Lying about the abusive nature of some cultures is a better way to live?

Squandering the values and principles of The Enlightenment is a better way to live - values with led to the greatest & most free country humanity has ever known (America)?

No Enlightenment, no major scientific advances, no moon visit, no medical advances, no advancing of art & literature, no healthy entrepreneurism. Oh, and also no abolishment of slavery (in The West anyway - slavery still goes on in Islamic places though), nor giving women the vote, and on and on.

We only end up 'loosing fights' when we cut and run.

Islamic State is the latest example.

The ultra leftist hippie fear mongering isn't swaying me.

Trump is a breath of fresh air. Inasmuch as the traditionalist old fart right hates him, and the SJW left hates him, he's of very high value indeed.

And Brexit was accomplished by people who are tired of having their culture destroyed via unhinged immigration. By people who want to take control of their own 'tribe' and their own 'homeland.'

U.S. Constitution didn't come from the Bible. Rather it came as a direct result of The Reformation & The Enlightenment.

The U.S. Constitution didn't come from the Bible. Rather it came as a direct result of The Reformation & The Enlightenment.

On the back of Modified and Enlightened and Evolved Christian tradition.

So not directly from the Bible, but it was done by children raised within the general European Christian tradition that's true.

When I examine who on the social & political landscape supports a.) the freedom to draw Mohamed, and b.) the publishing of such cartoons, the list is very small: Libertarians who're mostly conservative, and a few very (very) lonely leftists.

When Obama states that his preferred future belongs to people who never talk smack about Mohamed or the prophets of other religions, he's turning his back on the principles of The Enlightenment, principles which allowed America and it's Constitution to exist in the first place. He's also turning his back on all the people who want to (f-ing) leave abusive cults like Islam (& Mormonism & other highly abusive religions).

more info:
http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho

So, it's true that ex-Muslims / atheists who pop up, rather naturally these days, within Islamic theocracies are little gems who should be valued & protected. They exist & live within countries which are essentially meat grinders, grinding against all opposition to the status quo.

Here's a special vid of an atheist visiting Mecca:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQ5x0vAEaCw

I'm sure that Obama would be upset by such a vid, as per his past comments about the supposed strong need to never offend a devout cult member.

Before 9/11 I had mostly zero idea what Islam was about. After 9/11 I woke up & realized that people in Islamic countries sometimes find their lives to be so shitty that they lash out in unhinged ways - misdirected anger. The 9/11 attacks were performed by men who were angry - but they should have been angry at their religion rather than at 3000+ innocent people in those towers.

The Enlightenment human tradition is a unique one, and one that should be valued. Freedom of speech. Freedom of thought. Freedom of religion. Freedom from religion. Freedom of commerce (mostly). Governmental transparency (hopeful). Freedom for science to progress. Freedom for science to question traditional religious dogmas & doctrines regarding literalist interpretations of a god. When leftists like Glenn Greenwald and Noam Chomsky (& many other 'regressive' leftists) blame America first for all that is wrong with the Middle East, they're also turning their backs on the Enlightenment tradition which allows them to speak & exist in the first place.

Mr. Greenwald is gay for example. If he lived in an Islamic theocracy he'd be suppressed at the very least or killed at worst.

The cold war abuses of America are not responsible for every single thing that ails the world. Religious theocracy, that of a specific religion, is largely to blame. And yes, it's a religion - that is Islam is a religion.

Before 9/11 I sat in my little ex-Mormon chamber and just thought about ex-Mormon things. I knew Joseph Smith was a charismatic charlatan. I know Brigham Young was an abusive authoritarian theocratic bozo. I relished the works of people like Monty Python with their general criticism of Christianity (eg: Life of Brian), and of Mormon specific humorist organizers like Steve Clark (operator of Latter-Day Lampoon now renamed The Salamander Society).

Consider what Muslim versions of the following works of art would look like?

Life of Brian:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Python's_Life_of_Brian

Latter-Day Lampoon (aka Salamander Society):
http://salamandersociety.com/

Would Obama approve?

How about your average MSNBC & CBC & BBC presenter?

So I was raised in an itty-bitty religion which has as it's key tenant a required cult of personality revolving around this guy named Joseph Smith. Then when I got older I wised up & left that religion.

That whole experience provided greater insight into the entirely of the situation with Islam, it's followers, and those who want to leave it and be free of it.

A communist who left it (Maryam Namazie):
http://freethoughtblogs.com/maryamnamazie/2013/02/01/world-hejab-day/

A libertarian (Ayaan Hirsi Ali):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ayaan_Hirsi_Ali

Another libertarian & big Ayn Rand supporter (Bosch Fawstin):
http://fawstin.blogspot.com/

And some people stay in to varying degrees, or are just 'marginally' in:

Maajid Nawaz:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maajid_Nawaz

Tawfik Hamid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxfo11A7XuA

Maajid is considered an 'Uncle Tom' by hijab-loving Muslims though. And Tawfik is a former hard line Muslim w/key info re how Sunni flavor Islam prompts young men within it to consider getting virgins in paradise via suicide as a viable option for sexual expression (check the vid linked to above).

Charlie Hebdo was mostly killed off, and it's remaining members have given up publishing drawings of the prophet of Islam. So Obama's preferred future has been fulfilled re Hebdo. Hebdo was and is an ultra-leftist publication, but one which was 'very lonely' on the left - lonely like Bill Maher is, and lonely like Sam Harris is, and like Salman Rushdie is. Lonely leftists who could never get a Mohamed cartoon published in any mainline leftie publication if they tried.

In any case, I was raised an American Democrat. Now I'm a general middle of the roader. A moderate Republican/Libertarian, or a very very blue dog Democrat. But as per the response of the left to Hebdo (the murder of the artists) & Garland (Garland, Texas cartoon contest attempted to be shot up by Islamic adherents) though I'm a bit loath to refer myself as a Democrat at all. The response of the left to those events shows that the left, as it stands today, as nothing to offer people who want to a.) leave Islam, or b.) criticize Islam exactly the same way we've been criticizing Christianity for hundreds of years.

Also America isn't a full democracy. It's a republic. A representative democracy. There republicanism helps to quell craziness & chaos & stupidity which can come from 'full democracy.'

When 'democracy' came to the Islamic middle east, the secularists were mostly drowned out by the thoecrats (so far).

Where in an Islamic 'democracy' is one free to draw Mohamed? Nowhere? Then the principles of the Enlightenment are not being fully engaged. Freedom of speech. Freedom of though. Freedom of religion. Freedom from religion. Freedom for science to examine & critique literalist religious claims which touch upon the physical world. And so on.

There's slight bright spots here & there. Example:
http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2015/12/30/egypt-president-calls-for-islamic-reform-again-in-muhammad-birthday-speech/
http://www.clarionproject.org/videos/egypts-president-el-sisi-calls-islamic-reformation

But in which Islamic country can one be an atheist openly? Criticize Mohamed? Draw Mohamed? Lampoon Mohamed - EXACTLY the way Monty Python did regarding Anglican Christianity? Nowhere yet.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2530920/You-parody-Islam-says-Palin-Monty-Python-star-believes-religious-sensitivities-increased-impossible-make-Life-Brian-today.html

But some ex-Muslims (and friends) somewhere shall do this someday soon I hope (parody Islam in total Life of Brian style & more).

Welcome sweet & kind refugees from Islamic countries.

Cologne Out Of Control: One Week Since Migrant Attacks, Another Teenage Girl Hospitalized By Gang

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/01/08/cologne-out-of-control-one-week-on-from-migrant-attacks-and-another-teenager-hospitalised-by-gang/

Welcome sweet & kind refugees from Islamic countries.

There's a price to be paid for Puritanical dress & dating & sex codes. This is the price: Young men so f-ed up they're willing to rape & molest en masse.

Islam comes to Europe.

---

Tawfik Hamid talking about how Puritanical Islam fucks up the brains of young Muslim men:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxfo11A7XuA

A high percentage of Muslims believe in medieval barbarism and iron-fisted theocracy

"Total number of those Muslims who want sharia law and also want death penalty for leaving Islam = 269450621
in percentage = 32.69% worldwide."

from https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-that-90-of-Muslims-think-you-deserve-death-when-shifting-away-from-Islam

Find "death penalty for leaving Islam" at:
http://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/

more info:
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/opinion-polls.htm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2013/05/01/64-percent-of-muslims-in-egypt-and-pakistan-support-the-death-penalty-for-leaving-islam/

Nearly 270 million worldwide. And these people love their prophet more than not only their life, but more than your life also.

Dalia Mogahed is an abusive Puritan and cult member

In my view Dalia Mogahed is an abusive Puritan and cult member. Advocates for the hijab / niqab / burqa are basically Puritans. Liberals just hate Christian-originated Puritanism, but they love Puritanism which emanates from any flavor of Islam (eg: the widespread worldwide Saudi-funded & CAIR supported version), or when it comes via any idea that counters or casts doubt on any aspect of the dominant leftie paradigm.

Video interview of Dalia Mogahed on the Daily Show:

short url: http://on.cc.com/1RnSWKp

longer: http://www.cc.com/shows/the-daily-show-with-trevor-noah/interviews/lnkifi/exclusive-dalia-mogahed-extended-interview?xrs=synd_FBPAGE_20160108_326082216_The%20Daily%20Show_N/A&linkId=20219197

Response to the following point made by Dalia Mogahed:

---quote begins

What a Hijab does is it basically privatizes a woman's sexuality.

So what are we saying when we say that by taking away or privatizing a woman's sexuality, we're oppressing her? What is that saying about the source of a woman's power [in the media]?

---end of quote

My response:

13.8 billion years of evolution by natural selection has not "selected for" a privatization of female human sexuality.

Maryam Namazie's response to the hijab, a most excellent response!:

World hijab day - as celebrated by Maryam Namazie, the way the day should be celebrated (ie: without a hijab):

http://web.archive.org/web/20150906062424im_/http://freethoughtblogs.com/maryamnamazie/files/2013/02/maryam.jpgfrom http://freethoughtblogs.com/maryamnamazie/2013/02/01/world-hejab-day/

In my view Dalia Mogahed is simply a member of an abusive human spirit destroying cult.

Women within Islam are not free to go without the hijab, even in Western countries:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/acts-of-faith/wp/2015/12/21/as-muslim-women-we-actually-ask-you-not-to-wear-the-hijab-in-the-name-of-interfaith-solidarity/

Why is Puritanism ok when it's expressed by a Muslim woman who's in a hijab, but not ok when it's expressed by a conservative Christian?

Puritianism is abusive in it's own right, whether that Puritanism is expressed by someone like Dalia Mogahed, or whether it's expressed by past Mormon prophet Spencer Kimball or by John Harvey Kellogg.

Maajid Nawaz, a near lone truly-liberal Muslim voice, on the hijab:

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/12/29/the-great-hypocritical-muslim-cover-up.html

Quote: "...Even when adopted through individual choice, it is the religious-conservative assumption, this modesty theology, that women who do not wear headscarves are somehow sinful, less modest and not pious, that we liberals must critique. For at the root, it is this same attitude that is invoked in honor killings, and heinous acid attacks..."

Women in Iran who sneak & go without the scarf:

https://www.facebook.com/StealthyFreedom/photos_stream

The hijab is abusive, abusive for exactly the same reasons why Puritanism in general is abusive: It/they attempts to warp human sexuality into something it is not by default and by (evolutionary) design: hidden.

Because their are Islam-run countries which force women to hijab, and because mosques worldwide force women to wear it, it's abusive. It's also abusive because it separates men & women into an inherently abusive and unnatural state & relationship status.

Women should be showing their hair & necks, in public, to men & to other women. Period. And if you see value in "privatizing" the normal natural healthy human sexuality expressed via women's hair, necks, and faces, you are an abuser. And if you're a cult member who believes there's value in such covering, you are an abuser.

More on Dalia from Sam Harris:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eZmAmok5M3s

As a Muslim woman, I see the veil as a rejection of progressive values Yasmin Alibhai-Brown
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/20/muslim-woman-veil-hijab

The science of swearing, by Steven Pinker:
http://harvardsciencereview.com/2014/01/23/the-science-of-swearing/
...relates in my view to how some humans also don't enjoy "sexual system" activation in their brains, not-at-all!

Tawfik Hamid talking about how Puritanical Islam fucks up the brains of young Muslim men:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxfo11A7XuA

Why do desert tribes hate sexual system activation? Clothes on humans may well be natural. Otherwise abusive body mutilations humans engage in within various "aboriginal" "native" tribes (eg: male & female genital cutting aka circumcision) may also be "natural." Religions are natural. But not everything that's natural is good nor do all natural things make humans happy generally nor cause them to thrive.

In any case puritanism is abusive regardless of it's source, whether that source is Islam, Islamophiles, lefties who love Islam & the hijab, your local Saudi-funded mosque which forces women to be segregated and to hijab, or Mormonism, or Catholicism, or etc.

Somewhere between letting it all hang out and hanging people for doing so is where humans are happiest and thrive the most. But the hijab is more on the hanging-people side of things than any other.

Related post:
whitewashing history -- sex obsessed ancestors -- nudist hypocrisy
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2014/09/whitewashing-history-sex-obsessed.html

Charlie Hebdo rest in peace (RIP): Not all gods are equal, some are peaceful and some are terrorists

Copy of the January 2016 "Charlie Hebdo" The god of all religions a terrorist? I don't think so. Not all religions have the same god.

The original & only Charlie Hebdo rest in peace. The new Hebdo is not the same magazine as the old one. RIP Charlie Hebdo. Not all gods are equal nor are all religions. "Religion" as a concept is just as dangerous a thing when it flowers on the left as when it continues to exist on the right, and probably the leftist version is even more dangerous & denialist & dishonest.

[Charlie Hebdo’s anniversary edition proves Islamic terrorists won]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GiFl7eo4nBw

Charlie Hebdo claims that the "god of all religions is a terrorist" as per a recent cover talked about in the video below. That's not true though.

The god the Jains is not a terrorist. The god of most Amish is not. Even the hippie god of leftie Christians/Unitarians is not (except in as much as that god says one must law down and let fascists thrive "in their own lands").

The god of Mormonism is a horny white & delightsome man who has sex with thousands of women every hour of every day [do the math: to make 10,000,000,000 spirit babies in say 1,000,000 years, that's 1 baby making activity even every hour].

The god of Scientology is an angry alien.

The god of Catholicism & Anglicanism is a mystical undefinable asexual parthenogenic blob, and in the case of Catholocism who really really hates making Jesuses via normal vaginal sex while at the same time really really liking perverted old fart virgin pedophile priests.

The god of Islam is vain & brutal & narcissistic & jealous & mean & evil. Check the links at:

http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/

Not all gods are equal nor are all religions.

--------

Related posts & additional notes:

On the god of Mormonism:

Advise for TBMs on porn: Why society accepts pornography but not littering?
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2014/05/advise-for-tbms-on-porn-why-society.html

We were all just sperm in god's balls:
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/search/label/god's%20balls

Questions for Mormon missionaries (includes references to how the Mormon god had literal sex with Mary the mother of Jesus)
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2014/03/questions-for-mormon-missionaries-god.html

On the god of Catholicism (defined by a bunch of fucking mumbo jumbo):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catholic_Concept_of_the_Divine#Essence_and_attributes
and unlike Mormonism Catholicism firmly maintains the birth of Jesus was virginal:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin_birth_of_Jesus
God's wiener did not go anywhere near Mary's hoohaw, and in Catholicism God probably doesn't even have a wiener & to suggest as much would be sacrilege to Catholics.

On the god of Islam: the core text of Islam clearly states his intentions:
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/
...on that page check out the following categories:

Injustice
Intolerance
Cruelty and Violence
Absurdities
Good Stuff
Women
Science and History
Contradictions
Interpretations
Family Values
Sex
Language

Whereas the god of Jainism is much different:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism#God

Five main vows of Jains, which is a much different list from that of your average Mohamed lover:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jainism#Five_main_vows

Jains must be non-violence, but sometimes violence is called for:
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/search/label/iraq

God of Scientology:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4SBfhRmvzU
and http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x21d8ks_south-park-what-scientologist-actually-believe_fun

The religion of the "non-religious" left: anti-free-speech, anti-science, anti-Enlightenment

Islam v. Free Speech: Twitter Surrenders
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429190/islam-twitter-and-free-speech

Why ‘Draw Mohammed’? The Artist Explains
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429175/draw-mohammed-cartoonist-speaks-out-why-i-entered-garland-contest

[Bernie Sanders:] Global warming a worse threat than terrorism, "...climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism..."
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/427094/sanders-absolutely-global-warming-worse-threat-terrorism-tom-s-elliott

The main arguments supporting Sanders' assertion seem to revolve around resource availability:
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/sanders-on-climate-link-to-terrorism/

However what's missing from Sanders' equation is the impact of the Islamic meme set itself upon the stability and viability of societies.

Mark Steyn's response:
http://www.steynonline.com/7299/the-leader-of-the-free-world-and-his-universal

(that the Western political leadership is largely in denial about the real root causes of terrorism)

Obama's statement about what, according to him, the future "must" not belong to:
https://reason.com/blog/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho
(never talking smack about Mohamed)

Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz collaborating discussions:
https://www.samharris.org/blog

Maajid is an unfortunately-singular truly-liberal voice within "Islam."
Cartoon posted by Maajid:
https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/422342223460855809
more on Maajid:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maajid_Nawaz
https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz
https://www.facebook.com/MaajidNawazFanPage/

Sam Harris debates Cenk Uygur (an example of the new regressive left vs those few lefties who're willing to be honest regarding Islam)
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-young-turks-interview

Sam Harris chats w/gay neocon Douglas Murray:
http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/on-the-maintenance-of-civilization

Re climate change, Mark Steyn is engaged in a legal battle with Michael Mann.
http://www.steynonline.com/6234/the-silencing-of-science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bARjABDqok

Judith Curry & Mark Steyn at the Senate: 

excerpt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oh6zDbWMuP0

full hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KVTmo2Vxnk

Anyway I've come to conclude that, as per Daniel Dennett's "dangerous" idea regarding religion being a natural phenomenon, religion is so damn natural that two or more atheists gathered in the name of their favorite social or political agenda cannot help but form a de facto one.

Charismatic charlatans come in all shapes and sizes. When our favorite "prophet" is on our side of the political spectrum we're more ready to dismiss their flaws. For example when Clinton was in office I personally wrote to the White House expressing my support during their trials & tribulations. However I now see that I was hoodwinked, just like I was hoodwinked about Joseph Smith.

Why are the rape crimes of Bill Clinton given a pass while the probably-natural activities of Catholic Priests & other pedophiles are not? Just because something is 'natural' doesn't mean it should be valued. Sociopathy and psychopathy are natural too, natural abusive outlier activities that is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature

Recoverers from religion have a hard time seeing value in fully natural & fully evolved human morality which says "no" to certain activities. Why did fully natural religions/cultures evolve moral codes of conduct? For fully natural reasons.

So how "conservative" should we be? It's a balancing act. An evolution if you will. And we aren't the first people to deal with the tension between letting it all hang out, and hanging people for doing so. Somewhere in between those two extremes lies human happiness & human thriving.

Islam & Mormonism are too conservative.

60s/70s SanFran-Glory-Hole-style liberalism is probably too permissive.

Humans aren't Bonobos. Shame regarding certain otherwise destructive activities exists for some reasonable evolutionary reasons. Moral codes of conduct evolved as counterweights to proclivities which can be destructive.