Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, Neil deGrasse Tyson: Priests in the Cult of Climate Hysteria

The religious cult of climate hysteria, infects the brains of the 'new atheists.' There's other bad infections.

Socialism
Postmodernism
Third Wave Feminism, Critical Race Theory, Gender Studies, and all 'disciplines' which end with the word 'studies'
Marxism
Communism

Climate Change Hysteria is a tool used by authoritarians to control the lives of others. When will Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, and Neil deGrasse Tyson be leaving this cult?

I used to think scientific consensus had a direct correlation with facts. Now I see consensus as essentially being a warning sign indicating mindless lazy groupthink exactly consistent with all the trappings of a particularly bad religious cult.

Prime example: climate 'science,' aka Global Warming Hysteria.

There's cash to be made via lying, skewing data, misinterpretations, and having heresy trials and excommunications for detractors.

The current state of affairs is an utter sham, scam, Ponzi scheme, and cult.

VERY MUCH par for the course of humans.

Just recognize that climate-hysteria-related lab coats are nothing more than attire within a new bad religion, period.

Sanity, reason, skepticism, and honesty on the climate issue:

Christopher Monckton - excellent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RFj7wmp5-A

William Happer:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yL1FU442RFDy/

Ivar Giaever:
https://vimeo.com/140399283

Judith Curry:
https://youtu.be/1L5AVBOh4SM

Mark Steyn:
https://youtu.be/yEBeF_Rz1MU

Bill Whittle:
https://youtu.be/v_RuverrEZ4

"‘Nearly All’ Recent Global Warming Is Fabricated, Study Finds."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/09/delingpole-nearly-all-recent-global-warming-is-fabricated-study-finds/

The Church of Climate Change Hysteria, with priests and inquisitors. I don't wish to belong to this church which Harris, Shermer, and Tyson are apparent priests of.

response to CBC and Jian Ghomeshi about STFU Parents

for my own records a copy of a post I just put on the CBC's website, here in it's uncensored form:

STFU - strong words aren't they. This whole "child free" thing and being annoyed by children is something I have observed for some time.

If on facebook (FB) you or anyone are friends with someone with kids, if you think they're "oversharing" or if the letters or words associated with STFU pop into your mind, you don't deserve to be their friends or associated in any way with them.

Parents should not STFU. If you don't like being reminded about your lack-of-children state by a passive-aggressive attack on them via STFU-ing them, then de-friend.

Maybe it's a New York thing, but STFU isn't a particularly funny phrase. An attack on parenthood, even an attack *supposedly* couched in humor, is still an attack. Basically the STFU site is transmitting a message to all parents that they should not share the joys & pains of being a parent.

Parents shouldn't STFU. Just the opposite.

Y-E-S, to your question "Should those who don't want to see parental posts filter or unfriend instead of passing judgement?"

If your some childless leftie who's annoyed by parental updates, unfriend the people, instead of complaining about them. Or STFU. The site owner used the acronym first, and Jian fawningly interviewed them. But let's remember what those letters mean. Jarring, & shocking really. Not funny Jian.

The site: http://www.stfuparentsblog.com
and fb page: https://www.facebook.com/STFUParents

Crass, narcissistic, & mean spirited. A de facto "lack of life" cult - brought to you by the same cultural hole that bought us overpopulation hysteria, & ultra-lefties having no children as a result.

Related posts: http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com

Jian & the CBC brought us this page, this info, about this crass woman and her pages. So funny. So cute. No, not really.

------------

Related post:
STFU, "STFU Parents"
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2013/08/stfu-stfu-parents.html