Eat. Breathe. Rumpy-pumpy. Have kids. Repeat.

Eat. Breathe. Rumpy-pumpy. Have kids. Repeat.

Is this sequence really so hard?

When others stand to gain monetarily or otherwise because you skipped a step in the chain, you can be the recipient of life-blocking lies.

Smart people should have more kids, the more the better.

People in First World countries should have more kids also, because right now there's not enough kids being produced w/in such environments. Lower than the replacement levels in many cases. And importing third worlders to have kids on your behalf isn't that healthy of an activity. Outsourcing breeding results in slow motion suicide for you and a degradation of Western Culture in general.

Ideally smart people should stay in their home countries and help those countries rise.

I'm ok with a limited refugee system, but right now people from south of the border are horribly abusing that system for economic gain.

#ClimateHysteria is a Ponzi scheme & anti-human anti-life cult.

Nobel laureate Ivar Giaever:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awJs7qDWYfs

More:
Leftist Charlotan Virtue Signalers want your money:
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/10/charlatan-virtue-signalers-want-your.html
and
Priests of Climate Hysteria:
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/09/sam-harris-michael-shermer-neil.html

Leftist Charlatan Virtue Signalers Want Your Money

The de facto religions of the left, and the charlatan leaders of these cults, want your money.

The Clintons

Al Gore

Al Sharpton

Climate Change Hysterical Whores
The Stonewall Warriors and the Outlier-Rights whore groups
Planned Parenthood systematic poor & black person killing org.

All these virtue signalling leftist cult leaders & charlatan groups, want your money.

Historically religious charlatans would set up tents, and they'd say to the assembled crowd: "I am the most moral, give me your money."

Virtue signalling as a means of enhancing cash flow.

Yes there is good human morality. But the cultural left shows they have zero association with good morality.

For years virtue signalling leftists essentially sucked the John Thomas of rapist Bill Clinton.

Then Friend of Bill Al Gore found a way to use his own type of charlatanry as a means of getting cash.

While leftists support the 'right' to be a non-reproductive outlier, and to have such outliers shove their own implements right down the mouths of the normal inherently-reproductive people, well they also want cash in association with their lying cheating virtue signalling. Normal women & girls & families, to the f-ing back of the bus with these wastrels.

Redpill, from charlatans who want your money, and who use moralistic virtue signalling as a means of getting cash.

Yes there's good human morality, and that morality indicates that calling out f-ing cheaters is a damn useful activity.

October 11, 2017

----

'Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, Neil deGrasse Tyson: Priests in the Cult of Climate Hysteria'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/09/sam-harris-michael-shermer-neil.html

'Choose Life! Reject the violent fascist marxist racist enslaving death cult of the left'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/10/choose-life-reject-violent-fascist.html

'Leftist atheists want into your bedroom far more than the right! Evolved morality is couched within religious contexts. An open letter to 'New Atheists,' such as Michael Shermer, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris, Daniel Dennett, Faisal Saeed Al Mutar, and others. Also to: The Atheism Plus crowd. Atheists of Utah. Atheist Community of Austin. Unitarian Universalist 'humanist' groups. To all these.'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/09/leftist-atheists-want-into-your-bedroom.html

'Banned from a conservative atheists facebook group: conservatives who aren't conservative.'
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/08/banned-from-conservative-atheists.html

'The Batons of Christopher Hitchens; The natural underpinnings of social conservatism; Jordan Peterson's work'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-batons-of-christopher-hitchens.html

'Leaving the Fascist Marxist Left'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/02/leaving-fascist-marxist-left.html

'The Western Enlightenment versus Democrat leftist slavery'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/01/the-western-enlightenment-versus.html

'Trump versus Hillary: Trump had better Be the Republic!'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/11/trump-versus-hillary-trump-had-better.html

'The Problems with Hillary Clinton'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-problems-with-hillary-clinton.html

'My Journey to Conservatism'
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/09/my-journey-to-conservatism.html

Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, Neil deGrasse Tyson: Priests in the Cult of Climate Hysteria

The religious cult of climate hysteria, infects the brains of the 'new atheists.' There's other bad infections.

Socialism
Postmodernism
Third Wave Feminism, Critical Race Theory, Gender Studies, and all 'disciplines' which end with the word 'studies'
Marxism
Communism

Climate Change Hysteria is a tool used by authoritarians to control the lives of others. When will Sam Harris, Michael Shermer, and Neil deGrasse Tyson be leaving this cult?

I used to think scientific consensus had a direct correlation with facts. Now I see consensus as essentially being a warning sign indicating mindless lazy groupthink exactly consistent with all the trappings of a particularly bad religious cult.

Prime example: climate 'science,' aka Global Warming Hysteria.

There's cash to be made via lying, skewing data, misinterpretations, and having heresy trials and excommunications for detractors.

The current state of affairs is an utter sham, scam, Ponzi scheme, and cult.

VERY MUCH par for the course of humans.

Just recognize that climate-hysteria-related lab coats are nothing more than attire within a new bad religion, period.

Sanity, reason, skepticism, and honesty on the climate issue:

Christopher Monckton - excellent:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RFj7wmp5-A

William Happer:

https://www.bitchute.com/video/yL1FU442RFDy/

Ivar Giaever:
https://vimeo.com/140399283

Judith Curry:
https://youtu.be/1L5AVBOh4SM

Mark Steyn:
https://youtu.be/yEBeF_Rz1MU

Bill Whittle:
https://youtu.be/v_RuverrEZ4

"‘Nearly All’ Recent Global Warming Is Fabricated, Study Finds."
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/07/09/delingpole-nearly-all-recent-global-warming-is-fabricated-study-finds/

The Church of Climate Change Hysteria, with priests and inquisitors. I don't wish to belong to this church which Harris, Shermer, and Tyson are apparent priests of.

The religion of the "non-religious" left: anti-free-speech, anti-science, anti-Enlightenment

Islam v. Free Speech: Twitter Surrenders
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429190/islam-twitter-and-free-speech

Why ‘Draw Mohammed’? The Artist Explains
http://www.nationalreview.com/article/429175/draw-mohammed-cartoonist-speaks-out-why-i-entered-garland-contest

[Bernie Sanders:] Global warming a worse threat than terrorism, "...climate change is directly related to the growth of terrorism..."
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/427094/sanders-absolutely-global-warming-worse-threat-terrorism-tom-s-elliott

The main arguments supporting Sanders' assertion seem to revolve around resource availability:
http://www.factcheck.org/2015/11/sanders-on-climate-link-to-terrorism/

However what's missing from Sanders' equation is the impact of the Islamic meme set itself upon the stability and viability of societies.

Mark Steyn's response:
http://www.steynonline.com/7299/the-leader-of-the-free-world-and-his-universal

(that the Western political leadership is largely in denial about the real root causes of terrorism)

Obama's statement about what, according to him, the future "must" not belong to:
https://reason.com/blog/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho
(never talking smack about Mohamed)

Sam Harris and Maajid Nawaz collaborating discussions:
https://www.samharris.org/blog

Maajid is an unfortunately-singular truly-liberal voice within "Islam."
Cartoon posted by Maajid:
https://twitter.com/maajidnawaz/status/422342223460855809
more on Maajid:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maajid_Nawaz
https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz
https://www.facebook.com/MaajidNawazFanPage/

Sam Harris debates Cenk Uygur (an example of the new regressive left vs those few lefties who're willing to be honest regarding Islam)
http://www.samharris.org/blog/item/the-young-turks-interview

Sam Harris chats w/gay neocon Douglas Murray:
http://www.samharris.org/podcast/item/on-the-maintenance-of-civilization

Re climate change, Mark Steyn is engaged in a legal battle with Michael Mann.
http://www.steynonline.com/6234/the-silencing-of-science
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6bARjABDqok

Judith Curry & Mark Steyn at the Senate: 

excerpt: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oh6zDbWMuP0

full hearing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KVTmo2Vxnk

Anyway I've come to conclude that, as per Daniel Dennett's "dangerous" idea regarding religion being a natural phenomenon, religion is so damn natural that two or more atheists gathered in the name of their favorite social or political agenda cannot help but form a de facto one.

Charismatic charlatans come in all shapes and sizes. When our favorite "prophet" is on our side of the political spectrum we're more ready to dismiss their flaws. For example when Clinton was in office I personally wrote to the White House expressing my support during their trials & tribulations. However I now see that I was hoodwinked, just like I was hoodwinked about Joseph Smith.

Why are the rape crimes of Bill Clinton given a pass while the probably-natural activities of Catholic Priests & other pedophiles are not? Just because something is 'natural' doesn't mean it should be valued. Sociopathy and psychopathy are natural too, natural abusive outlier activities that is.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_nature

Recoverers from religion have a hard time seeing value in fully natural & fully evolved human morality which says "no" to certain activities. Why did fully natural religions/cultures evolve moral codes of conduct? For fully natural reasons.

So how "conservative" should we be? It's a balancing act. An evolution if you will. And we aren't the first people to deal with the tension between letting it all hang out, and hanging people for doing so. Somewhere in between those two extremes lies human happiness & human thriving.

Islam & Mormonism are too conservative.

60s/70s SanFran-Glory-Hole-style liberalism is probably too permissive.

Humans aren't Bonobos. Shame regarding certain otherwise destructive activities exists for some reasonable evolutionary reasons. Moral codes of conduct evolved as counterweights to proclivities which can be destructive.