Old fart establishment Republicans are against Trump.
Trump wants to do populist trade changes which should make hipster Bern supporters happy.
The more establishment rightists which come out against Trump, the more I realize he must be in.
He's not an Xtian fundie.
He's not a slimy raping (murdering?) Clinton.
And he's got some good big foreign policy balls.
Plus the soldiers like him most. And for flipping once the people who defend America should be given deference on such matters.
Response received:Q: Clinton is raping & worse?
Q: Trump has been accused of rape. What about that?
Q: Doesn't having big foreign policy balls mean we'll just nuke everyone?
My responses:
Response received:Q: Clinton is raping & worse?
Q: Trump has been accused of rape. What about that?
Q: Doesn't having big foreign policy balls mean we'll just nuke everyone?
My responses:
Christopher Hitchens on Hillary:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrzyVt1lbpo
More:
http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/every-clinton-sex-assault-victim/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/07/28/media-ignores-bill-clinton-double-rape-bombshell/
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/05/11/ann-coulter-every-rape-victim-deserves-heard-except-hillary-clinton/
No one left to lie to, interviews:Charlie Rose: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_RqyXT5bt4
cspan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZ6oY4dMeYo
And worse probable crimes of the Clinton crime family:
http://www.morningnewsusa.com/hillary-clinton-murder-list-shawn-lucas-seth-rich-victor-thorn-other-mysterious-deaths-2395504.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.php
http://www.infowars.com/evidence-indicates-michael-hastings-was-assassinated/
You know those tin pot hat righties who we all just chuckled about? Oh boo haa haa - Alex Jones, what a kook!
But, as OJ implied, if the gove fits, you must not aquit.
And Paul Joseph Watson is a mutch better representative of that section of the alt-right.
Hitch (on Iraq). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cp4U3garYSs
Milo Y. https://www.youtube.com/user/yiannopoulosm
PJW https://www.youtube.com/user/PrisonPlanetLive
Douglas Murray https://www.youtube.com/user/DouglasMurrayArchive
It takes a Britisher to remind Americans about key unique American values worth honoring.
In any case regarding the Clintons: apply the same moral compass you use for all things leftist. All the things you obsess about, to your current party leaders.
Oh pith. What's a little rape? Well, that's just "natural."
She "stood by her..." raping husband.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/27/roger-stone-pets-killed-tires-slashed-late-night-phone-calls-to-silence-bill-clintons-sexual-assault-victims/
"Stand by your raping husband...." to the tune of the song by Tammy Wynette, in a half drunk cornball country tone with a twang twang twang...
As for Trump:
http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/436890/did-donald-trump-and-jeffrey-epstein-rape-13-year-old-girl
ce upon a time, I was a lib-chump.
In 1998, I was more of a full-on one. A morbidly obese virgin with no children, living in his parent's basement.
--------------- quote of: September 21, 1998 letter sent to a nephew, quoting from a letter I sent to congress
The more people that do what Ms. Lewinsky & Clinton physically did with each other the better. While I agree that Clinton lying to his wife was probably bad - his responses are to be expected. Why? Because when you force humans into a puritanical culture where their natural inherent proclivities cannot be properly exercised, what else do you expect to happen?
--------------- end of quote of: September 21, 1998 letter sent to a nephew, quoting from a letter I sent to congress
...and the above naive and stupid statement I made back then shows how stupid I was.
Cheating in marriage destroys marriages & families, and ruins childrens' lives. So shaming for cheating is also natural, and that's the type of natural that should take precedence in such cases.
But by 2008, I had wised up a bit:
--------------- quote of the file: note for hillary clinton - may 16, 2008.txt
May 16, 2008
To the DNC from Jonathan []
Hillary Clinton has on her web site a petition about "counting the votes in Florida and Michigan." These attempts on her part to change the rules of the game are dishonest, unfair, conniving, and not helpful.
The "votes" in Florida and Michigan should >not< count in the primaries. Why? Because Obama promised not to campaign there & Hillary broke her promise. So the "votes" are tainted.
Do not give in to the unfair, conniving, and the end run type of approach Hillary is trying. Obama is the nominee. Period. Move on - and let's now win against McCain.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
in Portland, Oregon
----------------------- end of quote of my message to the DNC
A further note for Ms. Clinton:
Your tactics in this campaign have been in the style of Karl Rove and George Bush, and they have been highly disturbing, corrosive, and racist.
Earlier in the race I could have gone either way between yourself & Obama. But your actions these past few months have fully convinced me that Obama is the most suitable President. I frankly feel that you've shown yourself to be unstable, and completely unsuited to the Presidency of my country.
Furthermore, the rose coloring of my proverbial glasses relative to yourself and your husband has now been lifted. When your husband was in office I supported him. Now I feel as if I were hoodwinked.
I know many republicans were disturbed by the actions of your husband when he was in the White House. In those days I supported him and yourself. But after what I've witnessed and learned about these past few months, I can now finally see why so many republicans were upset with you both. And I say this as a person who is politically a United Kingdom style Green.
You've now embraced the "politics of personal destruction" by being an advocate for it. In the past you and your husband rejected this type of politics, supposedly. Now it's your primary modus operandi. So it's sad to see this.
This is an honest message.
Sincerely,
Jonathan
in Portland, Oregon
--------------- end of the file: note for Hillary Clinton - may 16, 2008.txt
Now, as a finally married man with kids, I've wised up even more. A man with a wife and kids naturally becomes more socially conservative. I have. That's "my journey." So why do journeys to slow motion suicide (eg: journeys to gayness AKA sexual orientation dysphoria, gay marriage AKA outlier flaky abusive not even a comparison to the real thing "marriage," transgenderism AKA gender dysphoria, abortion, being "childfree," and journeys to death cults like Islam) get to be the ones most honored by leftists, whereas journeys to social conservatism don't? Runs counter to their narrative.
Big balls: You know, like the microscopic ones of Obama compared to Putin. Crimea? Gone. Islamic State? Born & flourishing.
Nuking? I take the neocon view: We'll only nuke as a last resort, or if one of our cities gets nuked.
But the leftist rhetorical pouncing on the nuke option may show a not-so-hidden desire for them to do some nuking of their own: namely those who don't tow the leftist party line. "Hate speech" Crimes into differing categories based on "what was in the mind of the killer" - but such actions lend credence to though crime censorship via having "hate speech" laws and codes. And thus the entire concept of "hate" crime is corrosive to free speech. There's just crime. All crime is "hate crime." Camel nosing in the "mind of the killer" brings in a whole host of freedom-threatening problems.
Current leftist hate, hate, hate, freedom of speech & thought. They hate conservatives, family values, and anyone who tells them they're being abusive dickheads for being overly & abusively permissive & relativist. They hate narratives with run counter to their abusively permissive lines of thought.
The Clintons are playing everyone for fools. They know which SJW (social justice warrior) buttons to push. But such pushing no longer works for me.
The establishment Republicans who really want Hillary in, de facto, are showing that voting for Trump is even more important.
Is Trump playing everyone for fools? I don't think so.
Taking into account the totality of reactions from all parties, I find high utilitarian value in a Trump presidency.
What swayed me to Trump:
Milo's Y's interview with Dave Rubin: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DiA0P9iELAA
His interview with Joe Rogan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LnH67G7vAu4
Related posts:
Trump & Brexit: The Leftist Armageddon http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/07/trump-brexit-leftist-armageddon.html
