Utah Museum of Fine Arts: Unsafe for Women and Girls! UMFA Unsafe!

Proof that postmodernist fools and morons are present:

Video commentary in response:

link to video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0OSXtiO6eU

Denialist fools and abusive morons, morons who deny 1.2 billion years of evolutionary history and basic evolved human nature.

My response, to the museum - which they later censored on their Facebook page.

The cancer of postmodernism visits UMFA.

Risky, pro-rape culture, allowing men into the women's restrooms.

Human gender is binary.

Your sign is a lie.

Fools and denialist morons 'acknowledge' otherwise.

And having the State of Utah make such claims via the University of Utah is outrageous.

I don't want my tax money going to support neomarxist postmodern lies.

Their response to me:

Jonathan, thanks for coming to the UMFA today. We hope you felt welcome. It's important to us that all of our visitors feel welcome, no matter their age, ability, knowledge of art, background, race, sexual preference, or gender identity. Thanks for sharing this sign—we're proud of it.

My follow up to them in response:

Being proud of shoving neomarxist postmodern cult ideology down the throats of all visitors, is not a good thing.

Women in the women's restrooms, don't have a choice w/this policy which is an affront to 1.2 billion years of evolutionary history and basic human biology.

The University of Utah and therefore the State of Utah, cannot declare by fiat utter lies about human nature, human evolution, and basic biological facts.

Humans are a gender binary species, period. And men, any men, do not belong in the women's restrooms.

A risky atmosphere, for women and girls.

Pro true rape culture.

If you must have a room for the gender dysphoric, make it single tenant.

Your post is a middle finger to all sane people within Utah.

No tax money to support the neomarxist postmodernist cult.

Copy of an email I've sent to my elected state representatives:

It's not up to an art museum, an art department, art graduates, the University of Utah, or the State of Utah to unilaterally decide they can alter biological & evolutionary facts, unilaterally change human nature, and reject 1.2 billion years of history. On a main Utah Museum of Fine Arts (UMFA) restroom they have a sign which states the following:

"While building code currently requires gender binary signs on the doors, the UMFA acknowledges that gender is not binary. Please use the restroom that feels most comfortable to you."

The claim that human gender is not binary is an absurd, abusive, and factually incorrect claim.

There is a flavor of neomarxism called social constructivist postmodernism, an ultra leftist ideology which is highly abusive.

I agree with Dr. Jordan B. Peterson and Dr. Gad Saad that postmodernism is a denialist cult of the left with roots in basic neomarxism.

1.2 billion years of evolutionary history, and basic facts of human nature, versus absurd governmental declarations by the State that gender is not binary.

The postmodern ideology of the social justice warrior (SJW), versus facts and reason.

Yes the cultural left does deny science and history and evolution and facts about human nature and human biology.

The cancer of postmodernism visits UMFA, the University of Utah, and the State of Utah.

Risky pro-rape culture: allowing men into the women's restrooms.

Human gender is binary.

Their sign is a lie.

Having the State of Utah make such claims via the University of Utah is outrageous.

I don't want my tax money going to support neomarxist postmodern lies.

Women in the women's restrooms, don't have a choice with this policy which is an affront to the integrity and safety of women and girls, and also to our very key nature as humans.

The University of Utah and therefore the State of Utah, cannot declare by fiat utter lies about human nature, human evolution, and basic biological facts.

Humans are a gender binary species, period. And men, any men, do not belong in the women's restrooms.

A risky atmosphere, for women and girls.

Pro true rape culture.

If they must have a room for the gender dysphoric, make it single tenant.

The UMFA sign in question is a middle finger to all sane people within Utah. And yes this is about a cultural war, in this case a battle between anti-science anti-reason virtue-signaling SJW leftists, and women and girls who deserve better.

What choice are women and girls given to in this case to not have men in their restrooms? None.

Truly-female children and truly-female adults deserve better, from the UMFA, the University of Utah, and the State of Utah.

Again it's not the place of art graduates, an art department, the University of Utah, or the State of Utah, to deny 1.2 billion years of our own evolutionary history and basic human nature.

Big brains can produce the mental illness of gender dysphoria. That doesn't mean we cease being a gender binary species.

Gender is binary in the human animal.

Please have the referenced sign removed at the State of Utah University of Utah museum known as the Utah Museum of Fine Arts.

-----

Description of new Facebook page created about this issue, created primarily because the UMFA has blocked me from posting comments on their facebook page in violation of the First Amendment:

The Utah Museum of Fine Arts is an unsafe environment for women and girls.

If you're a female you have ZERO CHOICE regarding whether men can spy on you while you use the restroom at UMFA. Zero, choice.

Also the UMFA claims that humans are not gender binary, which is historically, evolutionarily, and factually absurd. Humans are a sexually dimorphic species period.

What's really at play here is the cancer of neomarxist postmodernism and social justice warriorism (SJWism) creating an atmosphere where UMFA managers feed they must virtue signal. But their virtue signally is not only absurd it's also abusive.

1.2 billion years of evolutionary history and facts about human nature, versus postmodernist utter lies and abuse.

The UMFA is actively censoring posts about this topic on their own page, in violation of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution - the Redress of Grievances. UMFA is a public museum and is part of the State of Utah.

Related links:
'Lives and families are destroyed by Tranny and Gay acceptance and promotion - LGBT abusive outliers are not equal'
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2015/07/lives-and-families-are-destroyed-by.html

Humans are a sexually dimorphic species, by Dr. Gad Saad:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aeYBG66YEs4

More from Dr. Saad: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/homo-consumericus/201212/sex-specific-toy-preferences-learned-or-innate

'Jordan Peterson - Equality Amplifies Gender Differences'
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JUxY_5-N81Q

More from Dr. Jordan B. Peterson: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYtzFBI-INU

'Transgenderism Has No Basis in Science or Law'
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2016/01/16143/

'National Geographic's "Gender Revolution": Bad Argument and Biased Ideology'
http://www.thepublicdiscourse.com/2017/01/18491/

An unfortunately-gender-dysphoric person (Blaire White) speaks about how gender is not a social construct:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9WqfBDjRF8

Ben Shapiro on the issue:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QtuqmThPE5c

Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/Utah-Museum-of-Fine-Arts-is-Unsafe-For-Women-and-Girls-519332035083387/

Choose to be a non-outlier if you can

I used to be an forced outlier. A 'childfree' morbidly obese suicidal fat bastard SJW living in my patent's basement.

Then I grabbed life by the pussy, redpilled in many ways, and changed.

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/09/my-journey-to-conservatism.html

I've been banned from many leftist groups on FB, a few in person ones, and a few 'libertarian conservative' groups. Big L libertarians do have a large blind spot when it comes to abusive permissiveness.

Today I was banned from a 'conservative atheist' group. I'm too conservative for the group owner.

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2017/08/banned-from-conservative-atheists.html

In any case I greatly appreciate Dr. Jordan B. Peterson's work & his advocacies. And having checked out Stefan Molyneux's past & present vids I can see how his redpilling process has been similar to mine.

Thank goodness I'm no longer the fat bastard pictured below. Grab life by the pussy, and change for the better.

And as for the book pictured, I disavow it's premise now also.  Outlierism is a side effect of the evolutionary process and it's >not< selected for. Thus the fallacy of leftist 'scientists' on such fronts. Yes sex is such powerful force that there's spill over effects. But in general you'll be happier if you can find yourself, or choose to have yourself, be in the non-outlier pool.

Banned from a conservative atheists facebook group: conservatives who aren't conservative.

Today I was banned from a facebook group called Conservative Atheists. https://www.facebook.com/groups/48625003215/

I was banned for posting the following comment in response to a post. The original post asked if 'LGBTs' had a place in conservatism. I posted my response and then was banned within about 14 hours. Here's a clip of the post to which I was responding...

Conservatism is conservatism.

----- quote begins of banned post

Space or safe space?

Socially conservative would mean conserving and valuing our 1.2 billon year evolved morality.

Are you inclined to make one of these (see the small human animal pictured) au naturel or not? If not, you are an outlier, either a forced victim of abusive postmodernism, or a much less common DNA type.

T - the gender dysphoric exist for sure. May they find recovery via mental health counseling.

L - please loose weight and try to be more attractive. You're cheating yourself and others.

G - most are abuse victims and forced outliers.

B - abusive denialist cheaters. Choose to be a non-outlier if you can.

---- end of quote

Wolves in the hen house apparently, or at the very least touchy outliers who don't like the truth of long standing biological history and evolution.

Apparently the LGBTPZ fiscal conservatives will not tolerate social conservatives who question their denialist liberal doctrines.

Gays are victims of postmodernism.

When I see people jumping off a cliff, yes that offends my sensibilities

Socially conservative atheists exist. Abusively permissive, denialist, pot smoking libertarians who are not socially conservative can't tolerate their presence though.

1.2 billion years of evolutionary history is so inconvenient.

Our evolved morality is not subjective. Whereas abusive neomarxist postmodernism is.

The censoring non-conservative admins of a 'Conservative Atheists' group on facebook:

There are alternate groups on facebook with similar names.

https://www.facebook.com/search/str/conservative%2Batheists/keywords_groups

Thus my own banning has not blocked me completely on there. But it's worth noting that fiscal conservatives who see themselves as 'quintisentially' conservative, really aren't.

A true conservative would be both socially and fiscally conservative.

Conserve, what's good about 1.2 billion years of evolved human history. The valuing of family. The valuing of life. Yes the valuing of inherent reproduction. And yes, devaluing abusive non-reproductive outliers. Working to help people live happy lives, through education and advocacy. Advocacy for the valuing of highly useful and good evolved human values.

Related thoughts:

'Lives and families are destroyed by Tranny and Gay acceptance and promotion - LGBT abusive outliers are not equal'
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2015/07/lives-and-families-are-destroyed-by.html

'Where does social conservatism come from? From human nature.'
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2015/11/where-does-social-conservatism-come.html

The Batons of Christopher Hitchens; The natural underpinnings of social conservatism; Jordan Peterson's work

Recently I engaged in a debate with a muckety muck in the Church of Sam Harris regarding Jordan Peterson. The man is highly upset at my 'slander' regarding Harris.

Some people fancy themselves as the quintessential sons-of-Christopher-Hitchens. They have their profile photos permanently set as a cartoon of a cigarette smoking Hitch, and they never change that photo to something else, ever.

From my perspective the batons of Hitch have passed to several people, and several of those people are on the current right-side of the political spectrum, much the chagrin of fervent Church of Harris believers.

Partial list of people who've been the recipients of a Hitchian baton: Andrew Breitbart, Douglas Murray, Mark Steyn, Gad Saad, and even Dinesh D'Souza.

List of people who're traitors to the legacy of Hitch: Sam Harris; Church of Sam Harris priests who get upset at 'slander' against Harris; and all atheists who voted for Her.

One person interviewed by Saad is Jordan Peterson. Peterson recently engaged in a discussion with Harris, and Harris could not wrap his brain around what Peterson was saying. Understandable for more reasons than one.

Peterson speaks valuably against social constructivism and Marxism (as does Saad). He also speaks valuably regarding the nuclear bomb level impact of artificial birth control upon the human animal. And even before I heard of Peterson, I wrote the exact same type of thing.

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/02/lies-present-in-conservative-religion.html

Regarding Peterson's religiospeak, it's important (and mostly required) to interpret the totality of it within an enlightened naturalistic framework.

Dennett's 'dangerous' idea regarding religion being natural cuts several ways. One way it cuts is that fully evolved human moral codes are couched within religious contexts. Another is that every single syllable emitted from the vocal orifice of Jordan Peterson needs to be interpreted within context.

A highly valuable project: more accurately (and without leftist SJW prejudice) describing the inherent, evolved, and high value to enlightened social conservatism, and naturalistically articulate evolutionary psychology.

Peterson approaches such a merging more than Gad Saad, in his own way Petersonian way.

Thus a great thanks to Peterson for opposing Marxism and social constructivism, on campus and off. And thanks to him for revolutionarily speaking the truth regarding one specific concern of social conservatives (widely available artificial birth control).

Valuable and fully natural scientific work.

-----------

The Harrisian (Sam Harris and his aficionados) brain has problems grasping many things. For example:

1.) That free will fully exists within the human animal, in a natural, reasonably adequate, and compatiblist sense. Dennett is right. Harris is a myopic hack on this front.

2.) That consciousness is not an ineffable humming glow.

3.) That male circumcision is highly abhorrent.

4.) That there was high utilitarian value to voting for Trump.

5.) That voting for Hillary was a huge betrayal to the legacy of Hitch. The crooked racketeering Team Rape versus a pro-American and thus pro-Enlightenment good-hearted businessman who used His Own Money to block the raping racketeering Clintons.

Also Harris engaged in malpractice regarding his psychological diagnosis of Trump, one which was petty, shallow, moronic, analy retentive, boring, stupid, and obtuse - and fully on par with most Harrisian projects and pronouncements.

So thanks to Peterson, Gad Saad, and others.

Saad is a social liberal. Peterson seems to be a moderate. When more scientists get some balls and brain cells, and finally see value to fully evolved social conservatism, then there'll be progress. But until then, the pro-eugenics pro-death nihilistic hacks aren't scientists but rather they're just worse than worthless nihilists.

At least Saad is willing to entertain conservative ideas without becoming an utter nutter. And Peterson is closer to the truth of the evolved situation, in his own Petersonian way.

What evolutionary process is involved when decidedly childfree denialist abusively permissive SJW leftists just want want want to import admittedly also abusive Muslims to breed on their behalf?

The SJW children of let-it-all-hang-out 60s hippies love forcibly-hijabbed women and abusive Islamic Puritanism and Islamic large families.

Whodatthunkit.

Yes Islam warps natural evolved processes in highly wrong headed ways.

A better course would be for children of the Enlightenment to wake up, reject baby killing and artificial birth control, and breed themselves rather than to import rapey barbarian savages to breed on their behalf.

In any case Harrisian logic is rather like a weak cog in a half baked pie, to mix a metaphor. Krausian logic isn't any better by the way.

------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpts from an exchange with a Church of Harris priest (COHP) on all the above:

"Peterson's ideas are only valuable inasmuch as one is willing to take his epistemologically foolhardy presuppositions for granted."

My response:

Hardly. No more than one must assume the god believer does everything in his life >because< his god is a 100% actual fact, as opposed to a perceived fact - one which exists within the required/knowledge support structure of the meme-gene system in which he exists.

Why do people do the things they do? A combination of biology, biological history, genes and memes, which all inseparably play off each other.

Biology, evolution, life, and ideas which are rooted in various aspects of being alive, and a processing machine which can (by happenstance and not) be used for other purposes also. But even those other purposes tie into the fundamentals of existence.

For example the mathematician and physicist usually want humanity to survive, and they can be driven to use their realms of knowledge for fully biological-imperative type purposes.

How does the world work, and thus by extension how do humans work.

Peterson is concerned about what happens when humans toss the baby of morality with the bath water of religion.

Since religion is a fully natural memetic-encasement of evolved morality, it's reasonable to add 'evolved' as a preface word to the terms 'religion' and 'morality.'

COHP: "Again, his epistemology is predicated on an exceptionally precarious conceptual foundation"

Response:

It's a fundamental fallacy and also myopic to assume that expressed-views are only valid if the person expressing them can articulately state a reasonable fully-scoped foundation for those views.

Peterson uses religiospeak which must be taken within a naturalistic context. There's no other context which is reasonable. And a lack of understanding on the part of the naturalistic evaluator can lead to fundamentally flawed conclusions.

Aside from the terms he uses, Peterson has concerns about the state of humanity, concerns which do directly relate to Dennett's dangerous idea regarding religion being natural, Peterson's concerns are highly relevant, telling, and apparently factual.

The baby of evolved human morality tossed with the bath water of evolved and fully natural mysticism.

There's big costs and impacts.

COHP: "His entire philosophy collapses beneath the weight of its own incoherence."

Response:

He seems pretty coherent to me. His concerns are highly valid and valuable to make note of.

The memetic bathtub he's in is interesting and nuanced, and must and can only be understood within an enlightened naturalistic context.

COHP: "an epistemology anchored to an ontological fact is conceptually unsustainable."

Response:

How does the world work.

How do humans work.

What is human nature.

Why do humans do what they do.

Why are we here.

How can we survive.

The noob atheist, the rebellious leftist and weed smoking libertarian, all assume that without (the concept of) a god everything is permitted. Such people, and their abusively permissive and denialist meme sets, simply do not understand how the world and humans work.

COHP: "It's based on essentially circular logic"

Response:
You're stuck in the weeds of philosophical word games and forced paths which fully fail to understand what's going on, with Peterson and with religious believers in general.

Idea sets which are inadequately contextualized need not be 100% self consistent nor 100% 'reasonable' to be 'valid.' 'Valid' meaning having naturalistic causes, and meme sets which can result in reasonable naturalistically-rephrased ideas and natural material useful facts.

As for circularity, humans are evolved animals, and many aspects of human nature circle back to this fact and the general facts of how the human animal works.

COHP: "any truth claim he makes atop that foundation instantly fails."

Response:

...only for those who lack a fully contextualized and enlightened materialistic understanding of what's going on.

COHP: "It's important that one's conception of truth can at least sustain itself."

Response:

Religions do sustain themselves via and for natural reasons.

COHP: "Peterson's truth eats its own tail in a million different ways."

Response:

Not that I've seen. And the truths within religions need to, and can only be, properly understood within natural contexts.

COHP: "If his definition of truth ultimately leads to the extinction of the human race..."

Response:

He wants us to survive, and rightly so.

COHP: "...does that mean that it was never true?"

Response:

Properly contextualized truth, yes.

COHP: "It makes absolutely no sense."

Response:

He makes sense to me.

Marxism: Peterson observed highly negative impacts. He doesn't like what he saw. He doesn't want a repeat.

One of Peterson's points is that rejecting traditional religion can lead to errors in thinking, and to incredibly high levels of abusiveness, denialisms, and moronity, as was and is the case with Marxism. The utter stupidity continues on campus today.

COHP: "The soviet union"

Response:

...was an anti-human-nature identitarian leftist utopian totalitarian evil corrosive human spirit destroying dead-end endeavor. Peterson knows this.

COHP: "It was the result of disillusionment in the church..."

Response:

...which led to something far worse. And the Soviet Union was a de facto religion, as is Marxism.

Visit most any atheist (or humanist or Unitarian Universalist) group in America.

State to them that you enjoy Duck Dynasty, and that you're a pro-life anti-gay-"marriage" atheist. See how long it takes for them to boot you: faster than a Mormon Bishop. A de facto religion with dogma, doctrines, heresy trials, and excommunication.

COHP: "Most Nazis were devout Christians."

Response:

Fascism is a left spectrum endeavor. National Socialism.

There is identitarianism in both Marxism and fascism. Group rights and group blames. Utopianism. De facto eugenics. Racism. Dogmas. Doctrines. Heresy trials.

Yes I see that Communism/Marxism and fascism all have corrosive tribalistic elements and religious ones too. Peterson rightly points out negative impacts.

COHP: "You've COMPLETELY misconstrued Dennett..."

Response:

Many hours listening to Dennett.

COHP: "Sam's positions."

Response:

Ditto.

Harris is a myopic hack.

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/search/label/sam%20harris

...on many fronts.

No Hitch-honoring Hitch-appreciator could or ever would vote for a Clinton.

The micro differentiations between spandrels and other effects are weedy sticky mud, regarding arguing about differences between what's one and what another. False choices based on myopathy. Why? Because here's the situation as previously noted:

Religion is a natural phenomenon which couches evolved traits.

There's synergies between memes and genes.

Not all religions are equal regarding positive and negative impacts.

Harrisian woo (Chamlers and Harris):

https://youtu.be/qi2ok47fFcY

https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/05/the-woo-of-sam-harris-consciousness.html

Harris didn't learn from:

Dennett.
Hitchens.
Gad Saad.
Jordan Peterson.
Me, whom he censored.

------------------------------------------------------------ end of quote of direct exchange

Am I a quintessential 'son of Hitch?' Hitch isn't more important than my family & I don't claim he was correct on all issues. During his tenure I was partially swayed to the pro-Iraq-war side, but now I'm much more skeptical regarding the value of it. Moron Bush and even-worse moron Obama screwed up the place big time.

Time for Trumpian pragmatism now. But Hitch did free many brains from dogma, especially from leftist dogma.

Leaving the Fascist Marxist Left

As per Berkeley, the fascism is on the left now. And really it always was. Name of the Nazi party: National Socialist German Workers. Thus a left spectrum endeavor.

Marxists and fascists only differ regarding the groups they love & the groups they hate. Group rights. Group blames. A hierarchy of group rights and group blames. Neither are conservative based ideologies.

Up until very recently, smart people on 'the left' defended free speech. Those (now increasingly vanishing & very hard to find) 'smart people' have been fully sidelined and silenced by mobs of entitled jack booted brownshirted moron proto-nazi youth.
In response, many are leaving the fascist Marxist left. Waking up from the cult. Milo attracts many such people. Trump also.

Dave Rubin and Gad Saad and Dennis Prager are generally helping. Mark Steyn. Douglas Murray. Ayaan Hirsi Ali.

Also the people Saad and Rubin tend to interview.

All people referenced including Trump are implicitly or explicitly Western Enlightenment advocates, and America is they best cradle of Enlightenment values.

The Berkeley Brownshirted fascist-Marxists are violent. The angry traitorous seditious beta males and violent SJW lesbians. So the gays are involved in the war also.

Free speech wars (Rubin):

https://youtu.be/p_KUf_giuZo

Leaving the left (Rubin):

https://youtu.be/hiVQ8vrGA_8

Fighting social constructivism (aka reheated denialist abusive fact-free Marxism) on campus:

Saad with Michael Rectenwald:

https://youtu.be/b8pZtIPMItQ

Saad with Philip Carl Salzman:

https://youtu.be/GLGzkC1w_Xc

Elbert Guillory on the current fascist left:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK0h19S9H_0

Examples of the fascist left:
http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2017/02/01/man-punched-riots-uc-berkeley-milo-event/

http://www.breitbart.com/tag/berkeley/
 
http://www.breitbart.com/tag/uc-berkeley/

...people were also beaten unconscious, clubbed with bats, and maced. And there was over $100,000 in property damage. One of the fascist groups involved: http://www.bamn.com

Another: Berkeley antifa. Brownshirt leftists. The Nazi Youth, of today.

-----My Journey to Conservatism:
https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/09/my-journey-to-conservatism.html

The Western Enlightenment versus Democrat leftist slavery

The Western Enlightenment versus Democrat leftist slavery:

Lies underpin rackets. The racket of the Democrat party for example.

The social justice warriors sit in their meeting houses (such as at Unitarian Universalist churches). They dream of who can be the top level victim next.

1. Muslims, and especially hijab/burqa wearing Saudi style Muslims.
2. "Childfree" third wave feminists with blue hair.
3. The gender dysphoric (transexuals).
4. The sexual orientation dysphoric (aka gays).
5. Mexicans.
6. 'Native' Americans AKA Amerindians.
7. Leftist black women.
8. Leftist black men.
9. Leftist white women.
10. Conservative black women.
11. Conservative black men.
12. Asian men & women.
13. Conservative white women.
14. Leftist white men.
15. Conservative white men.
16. Ex-Muslims.

It's a victimhood competition.

The only way for a pink skin (ie: white), to move up the list is to either a.) become Muslim, or b.) deny your 1.2 billion year evolved DNA coded gender, or c.) engage in the lie first hand that forcing yourself to (or 'catching' a stupid meme that you should) be a NON-inherently-reproductive outlier.

The left today only wants a diversity regarding superficial traits, but a monoculture regarding social theory - only their theory allowed.

The meme set known as the Democrat Party is responsible for slavery and booting Amerindians off of their land.

Vid to check 1: https://youtu.be/-SStdawtYFA

2: https://youtu.be/wp6yf5Rc6vw

As a reflexive naive chump noob atheist I too glommed onto the idea that the Democratic Party was for the common man and 'individual rights.'

But the right to do what?Historically: the right to be a slave or a master. The right to be lighter skinned, vs the right to be booted off of your land. The right to have your ancestors be from Europe, versus the right to have ancestors from Japan thereby resulting in your internment.

And today, the right to be a happy heathy normal female and male in a family with children, versus the right to be an abusive denialist unhappy suicidal forced outlier.

The right to be the master of your destiny, versus the right to be a slave in a current urban Democrat Plantation.

The right to be born once conceived, versus the right to he killed via a Margaret Sanger poor and black people hating eugenicist legacy group.

The right to be true to your heritage as a 1.2 billion year sexual history sexually dimorphic animal - one who's been to the moon and who crafted the best meme sets which help humans thrive: the Enlightenment and America. Versus the right to be a moron chump who believes a pack a lies so that a sociopathic elite can skate on top of your labor and support via indentitarian virtue signaling and having group rights versus individual rights.

I now choose to be with the moon walking people versus the belly button staring slaves.

Today, I am grabbing life by the pussy. And I want my golden shower.

Today, I am grabbing life by the pussy. And I want my golden shower.

It's worth noting how & why these stories came to light (pussy grabbing, and golden showers):

DEFLECTIONS from the raping ways of Bill Clinton. Smoke, designed to defect from where the true problem lies.

"...they let you do it..." Hollywood starlets do use their bodies as a means of getting ahead. Trump was commenting on that state of affairs in what he thought was an off the record joking conversation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/10/08/trump-lewd-attack-on-women---the-full-transcript/

Whereas, here's a list of women which didn't give consent to Bill:

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/every-clinton-sex-assault-victim/

As for Michelle Obama being teary eyed about mention of pussy grabbing, does rap music get her upset also? How about Pussy Control by Prince?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTJzs8iJVOc

And what about Mrs. Slocombe's pussy?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vRJlItzalJY

...from the British comedy 'Are You Being Service?'

Does plastic hypocrite moron Michelle Obama get upset these? And does Bill & Hillary get her upset also - you know, Team Rape?

So, the smoke keeps blowing from the left, and the left continues to ignore the real crimes of Bill.

This singular highly useful man helped free me from the Cult of Clinton: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrzyVt1lbpo - Christopher Hitchens.

I voted for Obama twice. I was a chump. My memories of Hitch and other still present people helped me wake up from that (Obama appreciation) stupid dream as well.

Thank the good parts of human nature, and the great legacy of the Enlightenment, that Trump won.

As for the Enlightenment values which founded America, Obama & the Clintons are no friends to those values.

Obama:

http://reason.com/blog/2012/09/25/president-obama-says-we-must-condemn-tho

Clintons:

http://counterjihad.com/ongoing-affront-freedom-un-resolution-1618-assault-free-speech

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/436854/doj-followed-obama-clinton-un-resolution-against-negative-speech-about-islam

Why it was good that Trump won:

http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/11/trump-versus-hillary-trump-had-better.html

So I'm all for grabbing life, by the generally consenting & happy pussy. And golden showers are fun for some. But these frolicking romps are a.) not crimes, and b.) they're nothing compared to the real crimes of Bill.

Don't let Democrat smoke distract from where the real crimes lie. And Bill's raping ways are just the tip of the Democrat/Clinton-crime pile (eg: pay to play racketeering, having an illegal home server w/classified info, and on and on).

Trump versus Hillary: Trump had better Be the Republic!

Trump had better be the Republic, as per very excellent evaluations by Pat Condell, Camille Paglia, Michael Moore's evaluation of why good people have good reasons to support Trump, Sebastian Gorka, Peter Thiel, James Kallstrom, and de facto Christopher Hitchens.

http://www.businessinsider.com/chinese-americans-supporting-donald-trump-2016-11

What may have seemed a 'farce' is actually a right-heated blue-collar-values rich guy trying to keep a couple of dirty raping crooks out of the White House. Using his own money to do so, versus the money of the global elite & non-free foreign countries.

The actual face is the state of the American old establishment media. The sociopaths who took little notice of the raping ways of the Clintons in the first instance, and who've played cover for them time & after time. Cover for a crime family.

'Advantages' of Hillary:

1. Maintaining the Obama status quo, where America 'leads from behind.'

2. Maintaining full funding for Planned Parenthood abortion clinics.

Disadvantages of Hillary:

1. Maintaining the Obama status quo, where America 'leads from behind.' Islamic State was birthed with the help of Obama & Hillary.

2. Maintaining full funding for Planned Parenthood abortion clinics. Up to 4 Supreme Court justices may be appointed by Hillary.

3. Hillary got the rapist of a 12 year old off the hook. Victim left in a coma for 5 days, and sterile.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/09/child-rape-vctim-slams-lawyer-hillary-clinton/

4. Being a rape enabling wife who slut shamed the victims of Bill.

http://www.thepoliticalinsider.com/every-clinton-sex-assault-victim/

5. Pay to play whoring (whoring out the public trust that is) at the Department of State & elsewhere.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/11/02/fbi_sources_tell_fox_news_indictment_likely_in_clinton_foundation_case.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clinton_Cash

https://www.amazon.com/Clinton-Cash-Graphic-Chuck-Dixon/dp/1621575454

Related film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7LYRUOd_QoM&t=78s

6. Classified information mishandling, illegal deletion, and deletion after receiving a subpoena.

http://www.inquisitr.com/3672706/hillary-clinton-email-investigation-nypd-source-says-clintons-involved-in-sex-slavery-child-sex-crimes-child-exploitation-and-more/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton_email_controversy

http://ijr.com/2015/03/264655-3-federal-laws-hillary-may-violated-secret-email-accounts/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3889994/Influence-peddling-acting-Putin-s-ally-hiding-classified-secrets-sexting-FIVE-separate-FBI-cases-probing-virtually-one-Clinton-s-inner-circle-families.html

7. Leftists are already attempting to destroy the 1st and 2nd Amendments. The 1st amendment is under attack at virtually all college campuses, and leftist-run cam. Why is the 2nd Amendment of value? Because it allows the citizenry to protect themselves against terrorists and unhinged psychopaths. Europe is toothless and impotent. Violent people there just mow right over whomever they want and shoot whomever they want

8. Selling us out for personal gain. One example:

Uranium One

http://ijr.com/2015/04/305269-2-hillary-clinton-influence-russian-nuclear-fuel-deal-clinton-foundation-received-millions-dollars/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uranium_One

Advantages of Trump:

1. Working to overthrow the corrupt left-right Establishment.

2. Working to overthrow the all the 'old media' which is part of the Establishment, the establishment which lies every day about conservatives in this country.

3. The people who support Trump, and who state why there's damn good reasons to support him.

Me: https://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2016/10/the-problems-with-hillary-clinton.html
Pat Condell lays out the case for Trump:

https://youtu.be/sHCul_DIM_4

Milo lays out the case for Trump:

[The interview which swayed me to Trump:] https://youtu.be/DiA0P9iELAA

Latest: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_CZ-o-LBRk&t=22m49s

Hitchens de facto lays out the case for Trump:

https://youtu.be/UrzyVt1lbpo

'Former FBI Asst Director James Kallstrom endorses Donald J Trump' TV interview:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cof09-Baloc

Michael Moore, explains why good people have good reasons to support Trump:

http://youtu.be/YKeYbEOSqYc

From Sebastian Gorka (recent replayable podcast vid):

https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10154642791576585&id=738761584

Peter Thiel:

https://youtu.be/ob-LJqPQEJ4

Camille Paglia: http://www.spectator.co.uk/2016/10/the-woman-is-a-disaster-camille-paglia-on-hillary-clinton/

Quote from article:

Paglia says she has absolutely no idea how the election will go: ‘But people want change and they’re sick of the establishment — so you get this great popular surge, like you had one as well… This idea that Trump represents such a threat to western civilization — it’s often predicted about presidents and nothing ever happens — yet if Trump wins it will be an amazing moment of change because it would destroy the power structure of the Republican party, the power structure of the Democratic party and destroy the power of the media. It would be an incredible release of energy… at a moment of international tension and crisis.’

---end of quote

Democrats should ask Clinton to step aside

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/columnists/kass/ct-hillary-clinton-emails-kass-1030-20161028-column.html

4. Trump advocates for blue collar values, and even for the value of Vocational Education - something my father spent his life also advocating for. Mentioned during this speech by Trump: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=544610579067653&id=414280728767306

Also I remember when Ross Perot talked about the 'great sucking sound' that comes from unequal trade deals. The Bushs and the Clintons are *for* globalist trade which hurts American workers.

At BYU they tried to teach me the value of such economics, dogmatically. But such deals run counter to the traditional Democrat values of my father, yet again.

Wall Street bankers and globalists have no problem with raping the American worker & shipping our jobs overseas. People like the Clintons use identitarian virtue signalling as a means of hoodwinking leftists into supporting them, while simultaneously being nothing more than corporatist globalist whores.

---

When it comes to the Clintons, the snarling watchdogs of the media — whose freedom to scrutinize the powerful was enshrined in the First Amendment by the Founding Fathers — are as menacing as a backyard full of puppies. They say that criminals always return to the scene of the crime. Voters must decide if they will send the Clinton crime family back to 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

...quote ends, from: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/435968/hillary-clinton-bill-clinton-crime-family-where-politics-and-mafia-meet

A borderless country = no country.

Like Mexican drug gangs & mass killings in secret graves in the hinterland? They'll be here even more with the mostly-borderless status quo or with an even more open border.

Want more Orlando & 9/11 & San Bernardo mass slayings, in the name of the prophet of Islam (SBUM - poop be upon him)? Import more Islam people.

The 'way of Europe' in these matters is a form of suicide.

Want Cologne-style mass rapes in America? Import more Islamic people.

At least in America we have the 2nd Amendment, an amendment which helps protect the 1st. In toothless impotent Europe, the common citizenry gets to lay back and be raped by the immigrants - and when they are raped, the police & politicians actively hide the truth regarding who's doing the raping. Thus Brexit was born.

America was founded on Enlightenment principles: the freedom to question (& lampoon) *all* ideas. Doesn't mean all ideas are of equal value. But we won't know in the first place unless 100% freedom of speech exists.

Want the Enlightenment to continue? Vote Trump.

Want a rape-enabling crooked pay-to-play sociopathic damaged plastic soulless harlot in as our President? Then Vote for Her.

Disadvantages of Trump (if he wins):

1. The crony sociopathic whores get *less* control. The globalist elite get to make *less* money.

Drain the swamp.