Seculars against ultra-leftist religious dogmatism.
Naive ultra-liberal dogmatism is highly present in the following de facto branches of the religion known as Stonewall:
American Atheists;
Atheism Plus;
Unitarian Universalism;
Council for Secular Humanism;
Center For Inquiry,
Atheists of Utah, and so-called
naturalists and humanists.
Since when did being human or natural mean we have to accept 100% of the gay agenda? Inherently non-reproductive sex? By default a petty dead end narcissistic lifestyle? Perhaps concern about homosexuality
is natural? How's that?
Most recently the LGBTQPZ community became very upset with the
New York City St. Patrick's Day Parade.
Found this on American Atheists'
facebook page:
Generally speaking the
American Atheists group, located in Cranford, New Jersey, is in my view yet another branch of the liberal dogmatic
religion known as
Stonewall, as are
all of the other groups I mentioned above.
My response to the social-justice oh so righteous warriors on the ultra left, who want to fly the gay flag at every possible event:
Not every parade needs to be a gay pride one. The boycotts are stupid IMO. The parade organizers get to decide who's in their parade. If the Stonewall place in NYC wants to have their own parade, they can. But they shouldn't demand to hijack the regular parade for their own agenda. Liberal dogma can be a de facto religion. Whatever American Atheists or the advocates for atheism plus happen to say isn't automatically on my own list of important agenda items.
The quintessential struggle of our time is not the promotion of the ultra-liberal agenda. Rather, it's just general advocacy for science, survival, and a prudent amount of hawkishness so as to curtail the actions of
world-stage bullies. That's my view...
As for the rest, you can put me on a heresy trial if you wish, but if you do so you'll be just acting in yet another religion, just one with a new name.
I'm not a member of your church, nor do I wish to be.
Related post I generally agree with:
https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=1467403400144168&id=293011477509961
Quotes from the post of the group
Seculars
Against Same Sex "Marriage:"
Just as black pride, brown pride, feminist pride, etc cannot be emphasized at
the Boston St. Patrick's Day Parade; the same applies to gay pride groups as
well. The parade and day has nothing to do with any of the causes mentioned
above. Blacks, Hispanics, Feminists, and Gays can still be in the parade, but
just not promoting their own identity politics.
*"In their defence, parade organisers claim that gay people are not
prohibited from marching, just not allowed to march under gay-themed banners. In
Boston, organisers point to the fact that gay people this year joined a
‘diversity’ float that represented a South Boston neighbourhood.
*According to Boston’s lead parade organiser, Philip Wuschke: ‘We don’t ban
gay people. We ban groups that are trying to make a statement.’ He notes that
they have rejected a variety of groups, including the Ku Klux Klan, Irish
heterosexual pride and an anti-abortion organisation, among others...
* Or you might ask, why do gay activists insist on joining a parade that
isn’t about their cause and, in the case of Boston and New York, doesn’t want
them there as a separately identified group?
*The notoriously anti-gay Westboro Baptist Church probably doesn’t expect to
be able to join a gay pride march, and gay pride organisers wouldn’t let them in
if they tried (in fact, St Patrick’s Day organisers in Boston say they turned
down an application from Westboro, which is anti-Catholic as well as anti-gay,
to join the parade)...
*This is the top-down, elite-led politics of name and shame, rather than a
properly liberal campaign that draw upon popular support.
*What we are witnessing is an attack on those who don’t share today’s pro-gay
outlook. Some may not want to opt out of this Culture War, but the war
increasingly won’t allow there to be any bystanders. Instead, there is pressure
to conform. Even if it does not spill over into the political or legal world,
such conformism is problematic for the free flow of ideas.
*The sky will not fall if gays and lesbians are allowed to march in the
Boston and New York St Patrick’s Day parades. But we will create a conformist,
intolerant and unfree society if we do not allow space for the expression of
different views, including traditional religious teachings about homosexuality
and same-sex marriage."
http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/who-are-the-real-bigots-in-the-st-pats-spat/14797#.UycY1PldWaR
---end of quote
Related posts:
Listening to the NARTH guy - issues more complex than either side says
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2014/03/listening-to-narth-guy-issues-more.html
A high abundance of angel readers and other nutjobs within the gay "lifestyle"
http://jonathanshome.blogspot.com/2014/02/a-high-abundance-of-angel-readers-and.html
Again from
http://www.naturalism.org/sexualit.htm
"...Since there are no objective harms of being or acting gay, there are no reasons to withhold any constitutional right from homosexuals, including marriage..."
But there IS objective harm! The naive liberal just doesn't know. It's par for the course.
And I am reminded of:
1. My gay uncle who died of aids leaving his straight family with no kids.
2. My
gay nephew who leads a petty, shallow, dead-end type of life.
3. However and also: gay people I know who spend their lives helping others, in service oriented lives.
4. Gay people like
Stephen Fry, who I largely admire.
5. The crappy crazy warped & perverse sexual morality in Mormonism & Catholicism.
In any case, I don't wish to be annexed by either side. Just because I think there may be problems with the petty selfish lifestyle present in homosexual culture doesn't mean I believe we should shame children for masturbation, for example, or teach children that masturbation automatically leads to homosexuality, which of course it does not.
Religion basically fucks up people's built-in sexuality. It can fuck it up so much that you can go WAY to far over to the other side. So in my view gays are ALSO being abused by religion, by being pushed away from normal productive human relations by the extreme anger on the issue present in conservative religion. So this is not a simple issue.
